Tatjana Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> @ Ishmael: I would not have referred to the shop
> as a "closed location". I wasn't was it? It was a
> "refused shop". That is a huge difference. I have
> filled out reports where the shop was refused. You
> just have to be creative. I've simply filled out
> the spots where questions and narratives were
> asked by typing in "shop refused".
That was my first impulse, but it would have entangled me in a morass of questions I could answer, questions I couldn't answer, and questions that I could half-answer. I could point out flaws that I'd seen, but I wouldn't have pictures of them. There were places where I could give favorable answers, based on what I had seen, but I hadn't given the station the same scrutiny that I would have, if I had done the audit. So, all of those answers would have had an asterisk beside them. (Canopy looked fine from where I was standing, but I didn't see what it looked like on the far side of the station.)
So, they'd have a bunch of information, but it would be, as I see it, unusable. And I'd have spent more time than usual on a report that I couldn't even submit without special help. (I'd have had to leave some of the answers blank.)