I'm in the middle of a two-visit mystery shop and I wonder if I'm doing the right thing.
Here's the deal. The final customer (paying the agency's bill) is high-end car maker A. The job involves visiting dealers for some combination of A and its five main competitors, brands B, C, D, E, and F. In my case I get to visit B, C, D, and E. The idea is to find out just how far the various companies will go with offering discounts. I have to make a first visit, get a quote for a high-end car ($100K+), then go back a couple of days later and ask for even more discount.
The problem I have is that I am taking up a lot of time of the salespeople of brands other than A. For example, one young salesman spent the better part of an hour configuring and pricing a car which I have no intention of buying, while other customers walked in and out. Maybe one of them would have bought if he had been more readily available.
I don't mind taking up the time of people who work for the final customer, or their franchisees; being mystery shopped is part of the deal. But I wonder about the ethics of company A paying an agency to /a/ spy on company B's policies, and /b/ in effect put company B's sales staff out of action for a while.
Or am I being over-sensitive?