Maybe so but my point is that it's not an ICA violation, in most cases. And if it were, nobody needs an ICA police to constantly point it out. We're all adults and the rules are easily available for all those who care to read them. Jacob can deal with those who don't. If Jacob doesn't care to do anything about it, it's his business not ours. We're merely visitors in his forum, not moderators, ICA police, watchdogs, etc...
If we don't want to tell who shops where, that's fine. I prefer it that way since I do my own research. But to consistently state an ICA violation when that's not even the case is false and misleading. Unless you've signed up with every single MSC on the planet, you can't know what each ICA states or doesn't.
Free speech. If the so-called violators want to *possibly* violate their ICAs, it's nobody's business but their own. I disagree that it becomes a reflection on all members. We, as a group, are not responsible for what each individual posts.