sportofficial Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sunny does this scheduler say why they would
> restrict a shopper from taking assignments by a
> particular client, yet still keep the same shopper
> on their books for many other clients?
>
> I don't think this scheduler gave you the whole
> picture as much detail as he might have chosen
> divulge with you. He just gave you the vague and
> lame generalized excuses that they mail ad nauseam
> whenever a shopper enquires about their status.
>
> Market force still has a lot to answer to HUNDREDS
> of shoppers and if they are anywhere close to
> honest they would answer to each one accordingly
> to their case and they would INCLUDE ALL DETAILS
> to those who have a right and a duty to know
> them!
>
> I am sure that all of us here do their best to
> perform a job to the best of their ability. When
> we fail, a little HONEST GUIDANCE from the MSC,
> would not only be appreciated but it could go a
> long way! Market Force does not even consider this
> option....nor gives this chance. They decide
> they're getting rid of a certain shopper and
> THAT's IT!
You are right Sport. Perhaps he gave a "blanket response" to why shoppers are penalized, deactivated or permanantly removed.
I did ask him why shoppers were removed and some "quite suddenly" and that is when he told me.. in my last post...
I think we all get "put out to pasture" when we reach a certain number of shops or they want "fresh new blood"...