@AustinMom wrote:
@msimon-2000 wrote:
I've often wondered if a shop that was rejected could still be packaged up and sent on to the client essentially leaving the shopper out in the cold. Great way to maximize profits, especially on bonused shops.
My question is why can't half the shop be salvaged and the shopper paid as this is essentially two shops at one location? If the drive-thru shop was deemed invalid (rightly or wrongly) then still use the walk-in shop and forward on to the client. At least this way, the shopper gets to recoup half the reimbursement and half the shop fee/bonus. Makes a bad shop a little easier to swallow.
I think the problem with this idea is that the client has specified what report it wants. If the client received only half, there would be no payment to the MSC. Now, the company could elect to accept half the shop and pay half the fee. And what reimbursement would the shopper receive - half expenses? But then the company would have to send another shopper to correctly complete the other half. How many shoppers would agree to make the trip to that fast food to do only half the assignment and be paid half? It already is not much money for the time spent and I sure wouldn't agree to do a half-shop for half price. And if the company used two shoppers to complete one assignment, paying each half, it would still be expensive on their end because it would cost as much in their resources as two separate shops - double scheduling costs, double editing, etc.
There lies the rub with these shops. If we look outside the MSC world and into the "real" world this would never happen. Say, for instance, that you hire a contractor (IC) to install a deck and refinish your driveway. The contractor does a fantastic job on the driveway, but messes up an element of your deck. Your first course of action would be to work with the contractor to fix the things that were wrong. If after attempting several times to correct the issue, you could refuse to pay for the deck, but you are still obligated to pay for the driveway. If you decided not to pay the contractor anything because the whole job was incomplete, you'd promptly be sued by the contractor and the judge would make you pay for the driveway and likely part of the deck as well.
As IC's, we aren't offered the chance to go back and correct the part of the shop that was invalid. Secondly, it wouldn't be that hard to separate the two shops and at least get paid for the walk-in portion. You already have two receipts, the reports are fairly segmented, and the shop fee/bonus could be split in half.
In reality, the home improvement contractor is going to sue because thousands are at stake. Us mystery shoppers are dealing with $20 or so and won't go through the hassle to use a legal remedy. In most cases, there are projects with this MSC we still want to do and raising a fuss would result in 'cutting off our nose, despite our face'.
Combining both shops into one visit makes sense on many levels, but it also doubles the risk financially to us shoppers as we have double the cash outlay and double the chances for something to invalidate our entire shop. I try to stay away from this particular shop, even though I actually liked doing them...just not worth the hassle for me personally. I respect those folks who are able to make these work for them.
"We're just two lost souls swimming in a fish bowl -- year after year..."