@jrossetti wrote:
@bgriffin wrote:
Ok, so let me see if I understand this correctly:
Edlund schedules shoppers for the PPV events for jrossetti.
jrossetti makes the shoppers sign a non-compete clause to work for him so in turn they're not able to go work directly for Taylor and Associates.
So then the fee the shopper COULD have gotten from Taylor & Associates is now split between the shopper, Edlund, and jrossetti.
Did I get that right?
Once again you have no idea what you are even talking about. I am going to ask you once, nicely, to kindly shut up about what you don't even know about. Perhaps you should engage in a bit of reading and understanding because the non-compete clause doesn't prevent ANYONE from working FOR anyone that they want. I know dozens of people who do work for me or for robert. Why would I care if someone works for someone else?
If you continue to slander and misrepresent myself or my company this is going to get serious very fast.
@bgriffin wrote:
Now I'm more confused. Is JRE jrossetti?
@Robroy wrote:
JB- Sorry you did not get a hit. So far you are the only one, IMO that qualifies to perform this type of assignment.
Edlund- From some of the postings on both threads it is easy to see things stated by one poster do not add up. Hopefully you do not have him doing these stings as they will easily be tossed out in a challenge. A good lawyer can rip holes in those affidavits. Joe Gagliardi has every right to go after anyone stealing the signal, but he needs to have qualified reps in the field. Carpet bombing for fines will only last so long when there are shady enforcers out there.
jrossetti- "No company is going to shut down and kick out their customers for someone calling and asking if they are showing the fight."
If you knew what you were doing you would not call ahead to find out if the fight is being shown.
"I can recruit a shopper to do a job, but offer them less than the $250 and pocket the rest. One company I do stuff for doesn't care if he gets the other persons affidavit from me or from them. He'll pay whoever turns it in. "
Why would you submit an affidavit from someone else? Now that is fraud, and makes it easy to challenge any affidavit you or one of your "referrals" submits. Also if your name really is Joe Rossetti it is not too smart to post what you have been posting and that may speak volumes about your affidavits. Then again maybe you are that guy from Carthage or a new age Zelig.
@bgriffin wrote:
jrossetti,
Please quote me the exact slanderous statement I have made.
@Robroy wrote:
JB- Sorry you did not get a hit. So far you are the only one, IMO that qualifies to perform this type of assignment.
@EDS - Edlund Data Services wrote:
And also, the forms are reviewed BEFORE you get them notarized, to avoid being in the situation you described above, bgriffin.
@jrossetti wrote:
The 5 P's of the military also apply to mystery shopping. Proper planning prevents piss poor performance. Do your homework people.
@Robroy wrote:
For many years I worked for a programming provider in the Signal Integrity department, stinging and converting accounts to a commercial license. What you know fits into a thimble, so I do not have any questions for you.
@lc1309 wrote:
@jrossetti wrote:
The 5 P's of the military also apply to mystery shopping. Proper planning prevents piss poor performance. Do your homework people.
But that's 6 P's.......
@jrossetti wrote:
@lc1309 wrote:
@jrossetti wrote:
The 5 P's of the military also apply to mystery shopping. Proper planning prevents piss poor performance. Do your homework people.
But that's 6 P's.......
LOL, You are my new best friend. I was wondering who and when that would be noticed.
Technically thought it's supposed to be piss-poor and I was being lazy.
@lc1309 wrote:
@jrossetti wrote:
@lc1309 wrote:
@jrossetti wrote:
The 5 P's of the military also apply to mystery shopping. Proper planning prevents piss poor performance. Do your homework people.
But that's 6 P's.......
LOL, You are my new best friend. I was wondering who and when that would be noticed.
Technically thought it's supposed to be piss-poor and I was being lazy.
Ehh.....I don't know that you interpreted my tone correctly then.
@ColoKate63 wrote:
I personally know the principals involved with JRE and EDS and think highly of them both.
@myst4au wrote:
Jrossetti - Would you be concerned if 1% of the day you did not have electricity? Out of 1,440 minutes, you would not have electricity 14 minutes. Probably OK, unless it was 14 minutes in a row and you were dependent upon electrically operated life support equipment.
Or maybe you could hold your breathe for 1% of the day? 14 minutes. In 10 second increments, lets see, there are 86,400 seconds in a day. 10 seconds at a time. Works out to holding your breathe 8,640 times. Big number.
Wait a minute, in another post, you said that you know "a TON of full time mystery shoppers," and I pointed out that that means either 2,000 or 2,240 Full Time Mystery shoppers. Lets assume that you do (I don't). So, 1% of 2,000 is 20 people. I guess it would be alright if 20 of them went to jail, as long as you weren't one of them. Wait, you said, "under 1%", so maybe you really meant 0.1%? That way only 2 of your 2000 Full Time Mystery Shopper acquaintances would be arrested.
I can assure you that I am not going to be of them.
@myst4au wrote:
Jrossetti - Would you be concerned if 1% of the day you did not have electricity? Out of 1,440 minutes, you would not have electricity 14 minutes. Probably OK, unless it was 14 minutes in a row and you were dependent upon electrically operated life support equipment.
Or maybe you could hold your breathe for 1% of the day? 14 minutes. In 10 second increments, lets see, there are 86,400 seconds in a day. 10 seconds at a time. Works out to holding your breathe 8,640 times.......
@ColoKate63 wrote:
@myst4au wrote:
Jrossetti - Would you be concerned if 1% of the day you did not have electricity? Out of 1,440 minutes, you would not have electricity 14 minutes. Probably OK, unless it was 14 minutes in a row and you were dependent upon electrically operated life support equipment.
Or maybe you could hold your breathe for 1% of the day? 14 minutes. In 10 second increments, lets see, there are 86,400 seconds in a day. 10 seconds at a time. Works out to holding your breathe 8,640 times.......
I think that we also need definitions for "Instant Expert," "101st Keyboard Ranger," and "Hysterical Hyperbole" because it appears that there is a a TON around here. All from folks who have absolutely no idea what they are talking about.