You said that you performed this shop awhile ago. Why did you take so long to address the issue here? Sounds like it is a moot point since you have deactivated yourself.@schylarsok wrote:
I did a movie shop a while ago and one of the guidelines was the ticket purchase had to be minimum of 3 minutes. I also had to bring a kid to see if they could be sold an R rated ticket. I brought my 17 year old who looks like she's 20 because I wanted to see if they asked her for ID. Naturally, they did not and sold her the ticket.
I was suppose to hang back as to not look like we were together and then buy my ticket 3 mins later. I was to observe who sold her the ticket and which counter was the person using.
Here's my problem. The lobby and ticket counter were inside. The windows were tinted. I had not been to this theater before so when I got there, I had to enter a few seconds after her to observe her transaction. I got into the lobby and there was NO ONE ELSE THERE. There wasn't anyone I could hide behind. I was made the moment I walked in. It wasn't on purpose and I didn't do that knowing the lobby would be empty.
I had to think fast and wasn't fast enough to think about getting on my phone and acting like someone was coming to join me. So I hung back for a minute or two and then went to get my ticket. I sat down in the lobby and then made a fake call and my daughter had already gone into the auditorium.
Because of the ticket timing, they declined my shop even though if I hadn't gotten the ticket, I would not have been able to complete the rest of the shop. I'm out almost $25.00
I don't feel like I should be penalized. I did another shop later and that was a mess too. I was out $10 on that one. I have since deactivated my account as I feel like we are ultimately ill fit for each other.
I would like some compensation. I do not feel it fair to not pay me anything. I'm a good shopper and I have shopped other companies with no problem.
Is it fair or should I just let it drop? $25.00 is a lot of money to just eat.
@Sybil2 wrote:
You said that you performed this shop awhile ago. Why did you take so long to address the issue here? Sounds like it is a moot point since you have deactivated yourself.
How long have you been a MS'er? I read a few of your posts and you seem to be having quite a few problems including reports not being accepted. Maybe you should accept easier shops which do not require a purchase so you don't have to rely on the reimbursement. As far as being out $25.00 for this shop, don't you think spending time with your daughter and enjoying a movie is worth $25.00?
It matters because instead of asking for advice BEFORE deactivating from the MSC, the OP deactivates himself/herself and then tries to back-paddle for advice. It is like closing the barn door after the horse has bolted.@Tarantado wrote:
Why does it matter if the shop was done 'awhile ago.' There were a couple late catches I found when I was doing a final round up come tax time, but was still able to properly address some payment shortages or overlooked bonuses from shops I did earlier that year. In the end, I was able to come to agreement with those MSC's.
@Sybil2 wrote:
It matters because instead of asking for advice BEFORE deactivating from the MSC, the OP deactivates himself/herself and then tries to back-paddle for advice. It is like closing the barn door after the horse has bolted.
So my interpretation of your comment is that because I deactivated before asking for advice means I should just write off all the money I could be owed? I am asking now, instead of "back-peddling" because this information was told me to me two days ago. Should I move forward with pursuit or should I drop it was all I was asking. I'm not sure were or why this tangent occurred. You've said your piece and gave your viewpoint which I appreciate but then why are you still commenting?@Sybil2 wrote:
It matters because instead of asking for advice BEFORE deactivating from the MSC, the OP deactivates himself/herself and then tries to back-paddle for advice. It is like closing the barn door after the horse has bolted.
I was responding to Tarantado's post directed towards me. I did not feel the need to put his/her name on my post since I responded directly below their post. If someone directs a question to me, I try to answer if I am available.@schylarsok wrote:
You've said your piece and gave your viewpoint which I appreciate but then why are you still commenting?
@bgriffin wrote:
So now we are complaining about *when* someone asks a question??