Writing narratives is good, generally and theoretically. If writing is thinking, then we who write narratives are using our little grey cells well. Or, this was a viable hypothesis pre-AI.
AI is useful for screening during data entry and has streamlined many work processes in many industries. However, there may be one glitch. In mystery shopping, the AI can detect potential 'plagiarism'. (AI cannot prove or disprove anything, mind you, but please bear with me.) My recent example is of being chided for duplication of my own work. All that really happened was that I presented the information for two of three reports in the order that the events occurred. For third instance of the same shop, I presented the information according to concept: service, cleanliness, or whatever was mentioned in the survey. I did nothing wrong, but I was chided for formatting information similarly more than one time during one round of shops. Thanks to AI, logical and chronological formatting may go by the wayside while we waste time with a different format for each shop of a round of shops. The work involved is good for us, but it might cost us in time. Time, for many mystery shoppers, is money. AI cannot reconcile these concepts with potential plagiarism.
Reading other types of writing may be beneficial, so I am spending more time with well written non-shop materials. This is good for me, too.
Nature does not hurry, yet everything is accomplished. - Lao-Tzu