Warning: This User Has Been Banned or Is No Longer Active
Sandyf, from the bottom of my heart, THANK YOU. Both for "getting it" and for your kind words. Your post means a lot to me. Happy Shopping and many juicy bonuses to you in 2019! Squireparty@sandyf wrote:
SquireParty, I too applaud you for taking these steps to make sure things are safe for future shoppers and anyone who has to come into contact with the particular security personnel you encountered.
In my experience many companies/government agencies have in recent years become very sensitive to those who perceive their status as a "guard" or "police person" as a ticket to abuse and lord it over the many innocent and/or guilty people they come into contact with indiscriminately. I have reported in the past issues where I felt endangered by some one who has stopped me and after reporting felt that all that happened was the old boy (or girl) network stepped in to cover for and protect their sister or brother. These days there have been so many lawsuits about this type of behavior I find the big brass you contact will at the very least listen to you. But still most people would just walk away and not try to fix things. We as mystery shoppers are fixers..that is why we are there in addition to earning money. You have taken this mission to the highest level. Thank you.
Irene In LA....Thank You for your kind words and your understanding, too. And no snark here, ok? I really mean what I am about to post with no snark, just to make my meaning clear.....that bit about hiding Jews in WW2 at the risk of my life? This HAD ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO with this shop NOR AM I COMPARING this unpleasant experience in any way to the Holocaust. So why did I bring that up about hiding Jews in WW2 at the risk of my own life? Fair question and it seems to be causing a bit of a stir here amongst a few posters. So please let me clarify.@Irene_L.A. wrote:
OP, I believe you and that were scared and left, had you had letter you would have had a different exit, however, the Security guard sounds like a major A___H____, and you did the right thing calling him out. They changed the instructions (thanks to you), so be proud of yourself. Being they paid you, no chance you'll be booted, but I do think this experience got the best of you. Comparing it to the Holocaust (my family survived) was a bit severe
.I suggest maybe to give MSing a small break, then return, I can tell your a good shopper, don't cut off your connections...there are other jobs. KSS sticking up for you says a lot. . I hope the Security guard didn't get physical. Whatever you decide, good luck!!
@Megs7521 wrote:
I’m not trying to lesson your experience because clearly, this freaked you out. That being said, even if a campus officer detained someone, that would not affect housing/employment? In order for something to affect that, you would need o be convicted of a crime that then shows up on a background check.
This reaction all seems a little over the top.[/Iquote
]I understand that officers with the power to arrest are on campus, though I don't believe this Security Manager had the direct power to do so - it would, however, not be hard for him to call his colleague with such powers. Barring that, should I have been detained, this shop is in a Central Phoenix location and police would likely arrive quickly - not instantly, but depending on variables, fairly fast. I'd imagine a call coming from a University might be higher up on the priority list than other calls, though I'm not sure? Perhaps the dissenters on this thread could shine some light on this one?
As to being arrested, in Arizona the arrest record stays with your for life (or until the age of 99 when it supposedly automatically disappears) - there is no expungement or sealing, There is a process called a set aside relieving you of guilt but that does nothing for you as the arrest record and original conviction still remain to be seen by the world at large. The ability for employers or landlords or licensing boards to see an arrest record until your 99th birthday is where employment and housing discrimination come into play, just to make this clear.
This is why the concern for an unlawful arrest ruining a life for no legal reason. This sort of thing happens all across America ever day, 365 days a year. At least it didn't happen here and I've prevented it from happening to an innocent stranger. Not seeking applause or a pat on the back - just human rights and to squelch the powers of someone who would ruin a life for no legal reason (perhaps to get kicks on their power? I don't know as I don't understand this mentality one iota....perhaps the dissenters could shine light on this one, also? I admit here and now that I don't get this.) Squireparty
Edited 6 time(s). Last edit at 01/14/2019 12:19AM by squireparty.
Sandyf....Truer words are rarely spoken. I could not agree more with what you have posted. Squireparty@sandyf wrote:
I agree with you Squire Party that we are not many steps away from bedlam instead of order and respect for all people. Things can fall apart very quickly if the wrong people are in power and for what ever reason the opposition to the power is not strong enough or listened to in time.
Hi B Griffin. This was not a reveal shop. And to be honest where I am at fault here is that I did not have the letter with me.@bgriffin wrote:
I'm.......confused. So this was a reveal shop, but you did not bring the LOA with you. So when you went to campus security to let them know why you were there the security guard got belligerent?
If I've got this straight......I have questions.
Why not just say "thanks for your time, I'll return when I have the letter" and leave?
How secure is this University anyway???? I've lived in 3 towns that housed 4 universities between them and have never had any issues going on any of the 4 campuses.
If the campus security guard DID detain you, you stated he had no authority to arrest you. Do you really think when you explained the situation to someone who did have that authority that they wouldn't call out the rent a cop for his stupidity?
It seems you met an @#$%& and let him get to your head. I would have just said ok fine and left. Not sure what all the drama is about. But maybe I'm missing something?
I agree with school safety too, and I understand the need for such. My take is more and more that this particular location should never have been shopped PERIOD without the changes just made to the structure of the shop. I will leave it to Lori or one of the other persons involved to describe such changes if they like....I don't know that such is appropriate for me to post as a shopper. Point being, the way this shop was set up, and due to the overzealousness of the Campus Security Manager, this situation has been waiting to happen. I'm glad there's been resolution that actually works for all parties including the MSC owner. Squireparty@breestjon wrote:
I did an inspection at a police station one time. I brought my letter saying I was there representing company so and so. I had more than one officer following me around the whole time, they even looked at the pictures on my camera before I left because of the sensitive nature of the areas I was photographing. If I did not have that letter I would not have been allowed to enter the building. I was not allowed to even walk around by myself. That was the job I signed up for though. If parents send their students to a college where the campus is protected by security, then you should have had your letter. My grandson's elementary school is locked, I cannot get into it without one of his parents calling ahead of time, and I have to press a buzzer and then show someone my identification. I do not agree with a over the top security guard, but I agree with school safety no matter what age a student is.
@squireparty wrote:
Within the parameters of my moral and ethical compass, I am compelled to do something to prevent issues for the next shopper.....such as getting the ball in motion to have the Security component worked around. I'm going on and on and I know you to be a great member here....have I made this all more clear for you? I believe too that some of this boils down to one's fear level when confronted by a wanna be dictator type misusing/abusing the small amount of power they have.....a small amount of power that is enough to destroy your life via unlawful arrrest. Squireparty
Fair enough Lori and I do understand that I should have had that letter. Granted and given. My main intent was to achieve resolution so as to prevent such from happening again. This has been done via the restructuring of the shop. I posted here not to retaliate but to only let shoppers know that funky situations like this do take place. And yes I should have had that letter. In my mind what took place was way way way excessive but I also believe by this point here I've made my points(s). If you wish me to stop posting at this point, out of respect to all who worked to resolve this, I will be glad to. And yes....next time either make arrangements for such a letter should such be required on a different shop or don't take the shop at all. Some blame lies at my doorstep and I don't deny this. Obviously I'm sure you gather by now that my take at least is that this all went too far on the part of the Campus Security Manager. I could say this individual could have handled things much better but, yes, it could be argued that I should have had the letter to begin with. No denial here on my part. Why don't I stop posting at this point? I've achieved resolution via the restructuring of the shop, and the MSC owner still keeps this shop at the same time. I don't know how much better an outcome there could be here. I've done my bit as a good forum member to anonymously post of this incident and at this point I'm probably best off exiting this thread, no? Thank You again Lori, and thanks to the KSS scheduler involved who was great about everything. With that I say Adios.@Lorri Kern KSS wrote:
@squireparty wrote:
Within the parameters of my moral and ethical compass, I am compelled to do something to prevent issues for the next shopper.....such as getting the ball in motion to have the Security component worked around. I'm going on and on and I know you to be a great member here....have I made this all more clear for you? I believe too that some of this boils down to one's fear level when confronted by a wanna be dictator type misusing/abusing the small amount of power they have.....a small amount of power that is enough to destroy your life via unlawful arrrest. Squireparty
I just want to clarify, once again, that had you appeared with the letter that we provided you, this would not have happened. I think it's kind of you to worry about other shoppers, but looking at the shop history more than 50 shoppers have shopped this particular location with no issues because they had the letter with them (that we provide). I am still genuinely sorry that you had issues (as is the MSP) but this is not common. It is an anomaly because you failed to follow the guidelines. I get why you are upset, but this is a private Christian college with set standards about whom they let on campus, so I understand why they were being strict also (although I can agree that the rent a cop was a little over zealous, however, it sounds like no physical harm was done.).
@squireparty wrote:
Fair enough Lori and I do understand that I should have had that letter. Granted and given. My main intent was to achieve resolution so as to prevent such from happening again.
The shop has been restructured in such a way that no letter will be necessary going forward. I will leave it to Lori's discretion to reveal specific changes to the shop - if she so desires and deems such appropriate. I don't know that such is my call. And with that it's time for me to follow through with exiting this thread. Happy shopping to you in 2019. Squireparty@SoCalMama wrote:
@squireparty wrote:
Fair enough Lori and I do understand that I should have had that letter. Granted and given. My main intent was to achieve resolution so as to prevent such from happening again.
Why would it happen again? The last 50 shoppers brought it, and the next 50 will too.
Thank You, Lori.....Obviously I am not up to snuff with the settled changes - I had heard from one of the parties involved along the way that the shop would be done internally in the future by either campus employees or students - hence my post that no letter would be necessary going forward. I didn't mean to mislead as to the final shop changes and I didn't believe it was my call to post what little had been passed on to me, which obviously is no longer correct, anyway. I will say one positive thing here - the Office of Public Safety on Campus, KSS (yourself and Pete, who I mention only because you brought his name up first) and the MSC owner have all been responsive, and fair to deal with as this unfolded, and I'd like to publicly say Thanks to all parties listed. Kudos! Squireparty@Lorri Kern KSS wrote:
The letter will still be required as per University protocol. The schedulers (Pete and I) will have to be more diligent in making sure that shoppers are aware of it. We will have to do more work for the same pay, but we will gladly do it to make sure no one else has your experience. Clearly, written guidelines weren't enough to avoid this situation, so we will continue trying to figure out ways to be more vigilant in making shoppers aware that this location has security requirements that MUST be followed (hence the higher pay for this location).
@KarenMSW wrote:
I read the entire thread and my take is that, while the initial experience was unnecessary, you are now taking this way too far. Did the guard overstep? Apparently so. However, as Lorri has stated, this assignment has been done multiple other times with no one else having the same issue because those other folks followed the directions and did the assignment correctly. Guidelines are there for a reason! However, you had a complaint, escalated it inappropriately and now will publicly trash the University's reputation (no you won't go out of your way to do so but will do so if given the opportunity). All because you didn't do your job. Based on the level of hyperbole in your writing (Holocaust comparison, really, because some idiot was having a bad day and invaded your personal space?) and the fact that you have stated that you are protecting others from a situation that more than likely will never occur unless those others don't do the job correctly, if I were you I would breathe, shake my head as to the idiocy of others, and move on. Your actions appear to be a solution in search of a problem.
Thank God. I was beginning to think that I was the only person, besides KSSLorri, that "got it."@Jill_L wrote:
@KarenMSW wrote:
I read the entire thread and my take is that, while the initial experience was unnecessary, you are now taking this way too far. Did the guard overstep? Apparently so. However, as Lorri has stated, this assignment has been done multiple other times with no one else having the same issue because those other folks followed the directions and did the assignment correctly. Guidelines are there for a reason! However, you had a complaint, escalated it inappropriately and now will publicly trash the University's reputation (no you won't go out of your way to do so but will do so if given the opportunity). All because you didn't do your job. Based on the level of hyperbole in your writing (Holocaust comparison, really, because some idiot was having a bad day and invaded your personal space?) and the fact that you have stated that you are protecting others from a situation that more than likely will never occur unless those others don't do the job correctly, if I were you I would breathe, shake my head as to the idiocy of others, and move on. Your actions appear to be a solution in search of a problem.
Three cheers ^^^ My thoughts exactly
I won't be here much longer as I'm real about being deleted but I did see that you had posted and your prior posts in response to mine had been civil and sincere and kind so I read your post. Thank You. It's like your post here is a consolation prize I am walking away with after being a forum member since I believe 2013 (but I'd have to check dates on this to be sure)....much like the credit union membership at the military affiliated credit union is - the one I found out I was eligible to join via mystery shopping one of their branches. Thank You, Shop-et-al, and I wish you the best with going back to school, with mystery shopping, and with life in general. You sound like someone with a great attitude and an open mind - I'm sure if nothing else life will have some interesting and positive experiences in store for you. Squireparty@Shop-et-al wrote:
Hmm. New day, new wonderment. So I show up at one of my considered campuses, just to visit with someone and get a feel for the place. I am in the middle of my next major life step-- old bag returning to college after decades-long absence. I do not have a letter of authorization for being there. I have an appointment with an admittance person. I have a letter from the admittance person, and a printed e-mail which includes directions to the office and warnings and advice about parking.
My vehicle does not have a visitor sticker. That was not provided for me. I just park where visitors park. Newbie parking official sees me, my old age, thinks I am there in drag to rape, mutilate, or do worse to the students, and calls the security division.
Security agrees. They sneer and jeer at my letter and accuse me of being the best %^*#@R* forger on the planet, and they haul my old lady butt to lock-up... Their boss tells them to verify. They verify. Meanwhile, it is too late to re-schedule. I sigh, drag my old butt to my car which by now has earned a ticket for parking too long, and drive away to the next campus.
Will the security people there be better, the same, or worse? So I have a potential topic for original research. This is a good sign...the only good sign...
And that brings us to the point of the mystery shop. All is not lost. Without the LOA, the OP is just one of some number of visitors to the campus who experiences the security staff. This is good information for whoever gives a damn about how they, their children, visiting academics, athletic visitors, and others might be treated by the security staff. Thank you, OP, for attempting to get past our dullness and into a place of consideration. Professors do this daily. You did a good job of teaching us, or at least of prying open a little crack where light could get in for a moment.