@walesmaven wrote:
Jasper,
Why can't people understand that part of the reason for the forum is so that we can discuss the mysteries of this industry as well as "just the facts, m'am." FF's post title lets us know that this is the former sort of post rather than fact-checking, warning or asking for assistance.
@French Farmer wrote:
"People come to here to get REAL information not read random thoughts. Is there a Facebook page or something for that type of thing? "
Dear Mr Johnson, I apologize if you found my post threatening or tiresome to you.
However, in my defense, the title of my post was of random thoughts. This was a warning to those (like you) who feel their time is invaluable and must not be wasted upon such tedium and monotony.
Yet, you indulged yourself anyway and then found the need to complain about something you could have just passed by. I suggest if you really are disturbed by my post to file a complaint with the moderator.
Once again, I apologize, especially to you, Mr Johnson.
@walesmaven wrote:
Criticizing posters for asking an MS-related question about tests is not a very collegial thing to do. Let's cool down before the mods shut this down.
@walesmaven wrote:
General Chat: "This is about anything other than mystery shopping." The OP's post is most certainly about mystery shopping, but obviously just not a part of it that interests you, Jasper. So, it is up to you to simply walk away and allow those of us who wish to pursue the OP to do so.
@lcubed3 wrote:
I can't help but notice the only individual annoyed by the post is a relative newcomer to the forum. Not all posts are going to be relevant. Just like the inbox of my email. A lot of them I ignore.
@JasperJohnson wrote:
The original poster claims that it doesn't belong here because of the title.
@JasperJohnson wrote:
Maybe it would be better received under General Chat
@whatwhatdb wrote:
The MS discussion forum is for discussions about mystery shopping.
@walesmaven wrote:
FF, you did nothing wrong at all. The objector appears to be someone who desires far more rules than Jacob envisioned, or probably would tolerate, for this forum. As many here remember, volition was tightly wrapped in rile after rule, some of which were never divulged to most (any?) members. This forum was/is a very welcome change and has long thrived due to that. It was a sad day when you were attacked as you were.
@JasperJohnson wrote:
Anyone want to talk about ...
Trump?
Biden?
Abortions?
Sex?
Religion?
@JasperJohnson wrote:
Why have this as a forum if not to use basic forum guidelines?
@JasperJohnson wrote:
Here's more examples of post in Mystery Shop Discussions that don't provide useful information or ask for advice.