Irene_L.A. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fried is a five letter dirty word, not to me, but
> to my waistline. The smell of a turkey baking for
> hours is part of it, more about the tradition, not
> the fastest way, and I'm not cooking a turkey in
> the yard.
> Taste wise it's up for grabs, but basting with
> chicken broth and butter is where I'm at.....that
> would be non fat chicken broth, butter, well, I'm
> not perfect.
Actually, you'd likely be consuming less fat with a deep fried bird.
My father in law has done a deep fried turkey or turkey breast each of the last 5 years. The keys to effectively frying a turkey are all in the oil: right amount, right type and right temperature. If you're cooking a turkey in 350 degree peanut or safflower oil, I will guarantee it will have absorbed less fat than one being oven roasted while sitting in butter. Being cooked faster, the liquids inside the meat have less of a chance to expand and the meat has less time to break down, and thus absorbing less of the liquid it is being cooked in. Plus, once the skin on the deep fried turkey browns, it will act as a partial barrier, allowing less oil to penetrate the turkey. The exact opposite happens with oven roasting. Longer cook times mean the meat will break down and absorb more cooking liquid, and the skin will not crisp as fast, meaning more of the butter will absorb into the meat.
Now, I will never be one to argue the taste benefits of butter (insert Paula Deen joke here), but don't assume that an oven roasted butter basted turkey is better from a health standpoint just because it isn't deep fried.