Ultimately TRU could not adapt well to the marketplace, keep their brand relevant and give customers a better experience, which seems to be the emerging retail trend. But what really began the unraveling started back around....2005?? Not sure.
Anyone ever heard of Bain Capital?? (I say in jest).
Bain, KKR (Kravis, Kolberg?? & Roberts) and another firm, Vornado I think, bought TRU with some cash and a lot of debt. You know, the LBO, leveraged buyout approach to business. They took hundreds of millions in fees. TRU was saddled with debt payments. That hampered their ability to reinvest in the business remain profitable when controlling costs became all consuming and it caught up with them in the midst of the shifting retail winds and business models.
It's not just Walmart and Amazon's fault.
That is the cliff notes version.
Financiers primarily look for squeezing profits, and not necessarily investing in businesses long term to develop and grow. CEOs used to do that through capital improvements, product development, rebuilding businesses.
If you consider the plans of many surveyed CEOs since the last tax cut, I think I saw a table of responses for what companies planned on doing with their tax relief windfalls that indicated about 41% of those surveyed planned on using the tax relief to increase dividends for shareholders and institutional investors and anyone with a mutual fund IRA or 401k--and stock buybacks. That means the stock prices will go up with increased limited supply, and when some corporate officers exercise their options, their stock is worth more and they pocket more.
I think I saw about 13% planned on raising wages for employees.