@isaiah58 wrote:
Do you understand why the preserves in those poor countries allow the old animals to be part of a controlled hunt to raise the funds needed to protect the core animals? There are hundreds of controlled hunts conducted across America, which BTW are for profit of the land owners. Many animal rescue programs in the US move animals like deer to controlled hunting ranches, taking donations plus fees from the ranchers. Do we list everyone hunting there? Yes, you are judging as hunting it s ethical even if for sport.
That's not ethics; that's just bad business practice. I would think that making a contractor wait 3-4 months to get paid would make that business fail quickly.@Irene_L.A. wrote:
I won't shop for Cirrus due to their ignoring ethics and making a shopper wait 4 months for pay....
@JASFLALMT wrote:
Well we probably should just round up everyone over 50 in the US (I am 56) and send them all to the gas chamber so that there are more resources for the young. After all, we are going to die dribbling spit down our chin and living a worthless life wearing adult underwear and pissing ourselves during our remaining years, many of us anyway. Or better yet, let us loose so that the hunters can pay a fee and gun us down in the name of sport. YAY.
@isaiah58 wrote:
Do you understand why the preserves in those poor countries allow the old animals to be part of a controlled hunt to raise the funds needed to protect the core animals? There are hundreds of controlled hunts conducted across America, which BTW are for profit of the land owners. Many animal rescue programs in the US move animals like deer to controlled hunting ranches, taking donations plus fees from the ranchers. Do we list everyone hunting there? Yes, you are judging as hunting it s ethical even if for sport.
I know, I was teasing you...believe me, I'm not for guns or shooting anything, even defenseless animals.@JASFLALMT wrote:
Irene, I was trying to make a point. I guess it would be better to just release people (or animals) and allow them to be shot while running away?
@JASFLALMT wrote:
Irene, I was trying to make a point. I guess it would be better to just release people (or animals) and allow them to be shot while running away?
@JASFLALMT wrote:
I think it's best just to leave it up to the planet. Earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes, tornadoes, etc. It's still awful but it's not up to us to decide who gets to go and who gets to stay.
@LIJake wrote:
My thoughts on this are if I strongly disagreed or agreed with a companies ethical, moral, religious or political perspective and it would cause me to have a strong preconceived opinion, either negatively or positively, about the company and its policies I would decline the shop. In other words, if I was prejudiced going in I shouldn't be there. Fortunately, this dilemma has not been a part of any of the shops I have done.
@Irene_L.A. wrote:
I won't shop for Cirrus due to their ignoring ethics and making a shopper wait 4 months for pay....same for other MSC's that don't care to pay within a month, and make interest through out the county on our money. I don't do banks over and over and would definitely not do jobs if they interfered with my ethics...many times it's not obvious as to underhanded ethics of a company, so, then, what I don't know won't hurt me.