When you get to the point they are asking what you were wearing, you have a franchisee that's disputing the reports. For those who insist they have submitted negative reports and suffered no repercussions, I don't believe it is the negative reports automatically getting shoppers banned. I do believe when the franchisee strongly challenges or just plain lies the MSC ALWAYS sides with the franchisee and the shopper gets booted. Just like there are shoppers who turn in fraudulent reports, you can bet there are employees, store managers and/or district managers who will lie through their teeth to discredit the shopper. MF should either be using shoppers they can trust or going to video shops so there is nothing to dispute. Another benefit to a more stringent screening process would be to discourage employees registering to find out when shops will be occurring. How can any MSC provide factual data with that going on?
This should also be a lesson to shoppers who "feel bad" when an employee or store doesn't do their job. The odds are good the employee won't feel the same way when you lose the client or the MSC.
Equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. It's not pie.
"I prefer someone who burns the flag and then wraps themselves up in the Constitution over someone who burns the Constitution and then wraps themselves up in the flag." -Molly Ivins
Never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of your time and it really annoys the pig.