There is much confusion and grey areas about recording in "public" and wiretap phone call law that has been co-mingled and there are even some states that have court cases that have gone both ways. If you are in a public place and are recorded, it is not the same as if you are recording a telephone call that has an expectation of privacy.
I would not want to be the one to challenge public recording vs some statue that has been used by LEA to defend them and used in a public area with no expectation of privacy. I audio record in a two party state and do not share my recordings with the MSC and only use them to generate quotes for my reports. I doubt I'm going to have an irate fired server have the juice to find out who I am and file a civil case against me.
I think people are taking this too far. Two party state = don't share your personal recordings.
OTOH, I can strip the audio out of a video recording that I will make with my hidden camera and I provide time stamped frame grabs of my video to back up events and score a 10 and a nice note in the Sassie platform for what takes me 10 seconds to grab a screenshot of the video with VLC player.
VLC: [
www.videolan.org]
Also, if you call into a company and they play a recording before you can speak to a representative that states that
YOU ARE GIVING CONCENT for them to record the call then the concent is a two way street. You are also allowed to record the call as they have given concent to recordings!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/27/2016 05:30AM by scanman1.