First, I did read every post you wrote. It might be obvious since each of my responses directly followed yours with 15 minutes to about an hour. Second, I commented on the tone, asked if your communication with the scheduler was similar and suggested what she might have felt "IF" you had used the same tone with her. In this case the word "IF" is significant. By removing it you have changed my message which could be construed as putting words in my mouth.
The fact is most of the information you just provided was not in your previous posts. I also asked you specifically about the location closing. Although you posted again after my query, you did not answer that question until today. People on this forum can be extremely helpful and provide great advice. However, without knowing the full story it becomes more difficult for those who have had the same or a similar situation to offer some guidance. For instance, knowing you were on assignments for this MSC that morning changes the dialogue. So does knowing the office closed at 11:30 while other branches for the same client close at noon. Although the shop was missed, it was not due to negligence on your part which would be the only good reason for deactivating a shopper. We all know there doesn't always have to be a good reason, but if you want to keep working with Ipsos it might be worthwhile to contact the scheduler again. If she won't help you then go to someone else and plead your case.
Equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. It's not pie.
"I prefer someone who burns the flag and then wraps themselves up in the Constitution over someone who burns the Constitution and then wraps themselves up in the flag." -Molly Ivins
Never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of your time and it really annoys the pig.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/21/2016 08:31PM by LisaSTL.