I interpreted it exactly as you did. I just don't see where the violation is.
Perhaps if there was some odd supersecret requirement but people talk about things like what observations are required and how much narrative is required all the time. I have never found it to be a violation. It's not like he asked for a list of questions.
By your argument you violated your ICA when you said this:
@roflwofl wrote:
There is a third company that does Freddy's. I like the third company's shop better than the other two. It reimburses a full meal for two, regardless of how much it is, requires purchase of two combos and two ice cream desserts, and pays a $5 fee.
There are reasons that a body stays in motion
At the moment only demons come to mind