So here's my concern with this approach. It's probably not the same as everyone else's, but this is my situation:
For the sake of simplicity, let's say that there are two types of shops that ACL conducts: "good" shops and "bad" shops. Good shops are the shops that shoppers want and that get swept off the boards quickly. Bad shops are the ones that linger. ACL now requires shoppers to conduct a "bad" shop if they want a "good" shop.
I actually like the bad shops. I usually conduct them every month because the ones I'm talking about in my location have a 30 day rotation. I like the good shops better, but those have longer rotations, sometimes 60 days, sometimes several months.
So now what do I do? This month, I applied for a good shop and was told I needed to take a bad shop to be rewarded with the good one. No problem, I probably would have taken one anyway, so I got the good shop I wanted and the bad shop I wanted too. But now, next month, I'll be out of rotation for all of the good shops. But it feels like I should get something for doing a "bad" shop next month. And since I'm out of rotation for all the "good" shops, they have nothing to offer me (except money, which doesn't come often, and frankly an extra $3-5 isn't really blowing my skirt up... I do the bad shops because I like them, not for the lucrative profit).
Sorry for the long post, but I think the biggest problem with this approach is that there aren't enough "good" shops to balance the "bad" ones. And if I don't get credit for helping out in the past, only for the month that I want a "good" shop, then that means that I'll actually be doing less of the "bad" shops than I would have before. Basically ACL is creating an economy where completing "bad" shops is worth more now, but only if they have "good" shops to offer. The bad shops that I would have done for base rate 3 months ago, don't seem worth it now unless I'm getting a good shop as payment for doing the bad one. This means I'll probably do less of the bad shops and the same number of the good shops. I don't think this is what ACL intended with this change.
Shopper in California's Bay Area