@Flash wrote:
If it is only one particular type of shop that is 'currently unavailable' you may not fit the profile the client wants for their target customer (and therefore shopper). The client may want to know how a 7 foot tall oriental female with a PhD and 9 children under the age of 18 living at home feels about their establishment.
Now? I think that it has been that way for 30 years.@bgriffin wrote:
I think it's Asian now.
@SoCalMama wrote:
Now? I think that it has been that way for 30 years.@bgriffin wrote:
I think it's Asian now.
@Sryii wrote:
Oddly enough there are many instances where the term Oriental was not considered offensive even within the last twenty years. There were medical journals that has the phrase Oriental in them and it was common phrasing in certain languages or even the name of some organize in different countries. Maybe a gentle reminder and a recognition that there are people who are old enough to remember when the word was common place here on the forums.
@isaiah58 wrote:
"However, Oriental is a neutral, inoffensive term when used as an adjective describing Asian culture or things from Asia"
@Flash did not use the term offensively.
@isaiah58 wrote:
I understand the groupthink mentality in the US. I have been in the Orient, other parts of Asia as well. I find the discussion here has gone sideways over a term used outside the US without any attachment to ill will.
@isaiah58 wrote:
I understand the groupthink mentality in the US. I have been in the Orient, other parts of Asia as well. I find the discussion here has gone sideways over a term used outside the US without any attachment to ill will.
That’s funny. I was wondering the same thing.@myst4au wrote:
I am, however, very curious about what you mean by " have been in the Orient, other parts of Asia as well". What countries do you consider to be "in the Orient" versus "other parts of Asia"? Orient once meant (in accord with the Merriam-Webster Dictionary) all countries in the Middle East and eastward thereof. So, how are you distinguishing the two terms?
@isaiah58 wrote:
Good question. In the early 1980's I spent two years abroad serving my country, in the Navy.
I visited, walked among the peoples, of: Hong Kong, Kowloon/China, Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand.
I used whatever term the citizens used. We were provided with guidelines related to safety as well as any areas of sensitivity.
Based on this discussion, I will talk to my close friends and mentors that are from several of the above mentioned countries, and ask them about this.
@Book wrote:
@isaiah58 wrote:
Good question. In the early 1980's I spent two years abroad serving my country, in the Navy.
I visited, walked among the peoples, of: Hong Kong, Kowloon/China, Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand.
I used whatever term the citizens used. We were provided with guidelines related to safety as well as any areas of sensitivity.
Based on this discussion, I will talk to my close friends and mentors that are from several of the above mentioned countries, and ask them about this.
This is where your argument starts to unravel. The ‘early 80’s’ is almost 40 years ago. Also, military bases abroad are in a bubble. They aren’t designed for service people to integrate with the local communities.
Thank you for your service.
@Jill_L wrote:
My husband is Japanese. He says that being referred to as "Oriental" doesn't bother him at all. People at work have called him an Oriental. Maybe he can file a grievance and we can get rich JK.
I refer to him as Japanese. My kids are half Japanese.
@Book wrote:
@Jill_L wrote:
My husband is Japanese. He says that being referred to as "Oriental" doesn't bother him at all. People at work have called him an Oriental. Maybe he can file a grievance and we can get rich JK.
I refer to him as Japanese. My kids are half Japanese.
Yes. And some black people don’t mind mind being referred to as the n-word. It doesn’t alter the fact that certain words are racist.
I can’t believe you would be happy if your children were being called ‘Orientals’ on a regular basis.
@isaiah58 wrote:
@Book wrote:
@Jill_L wrote:
My husband is Japanese. He says that being referred to as "Oriental" doesn't bother him at all. People at work have called him an Oriental. Maybe he can file a grievance and we can get rich JK.
I refer to him as Japanese. My kids are half Japanese.
Yes. And some black people don’t mind mind being referred to as the n-word. It doesn’t alter the fact that certain words are racist.
I can’t believe you would be happy if your children were being called ‘Orientals’ on a regular basis.
Book, you are crossing the line here by attacking people. Why didn't you correct Jill for saying "half Japanese" if your such a advocate for what you believe is how others should self identify?
The issue here should be why are we required to guess as to anyones race let alone how someone identifies themselves.
Several MSCs no longer allow us to use race when we describe someone. Estimated age, height, hair color and style, some clothing options are only required. Extra room sometimes for other identifying tattoos or piercings. Some have stopped asking us to provide gender (discussed here before).
Why would we call someone Asian that is not actually Asian? Hispanic that is not? African American just because they are black?
I am a human being, of the human race. Telling me I have to categorize my race no longer makes sense.
My biracial grandchildren are forced to identify by one race. At the same time they can choose from hundreds of gender identities. I am white, my wife is black. We offend people by identifying this way. Jews that argue we are people of color, hiding behind the term white!! Black and brown people of African descent that are offended by the term black. White supremacists that use this to justify their hate for Jews as well as any people they can actually identify by skin color.
Oh, and if I were to call anyone the N word they would be offended. If my wife were to call anyone the N word they would be offended. If we used that word at work we would be fired. If someone calls me a Jew, it depends on who it is the context it is used in as to if it is offensive or not. Kike is offensive. "Jewed me down" is offensive. Putz is potentially offensive depending on what part of the world the person comes from.
Our governments have no business slotting us like cattle into limited categories of race. We have no business judging our neighbors for being comfortable with how they describe their race.
@Book wrote:
I can’t believe you would be happy if your children were being called ‘Orientals’ on a regular basis.
Post removed as it contained an inaccurate quote and source. It was misleading and did not add a positive contribution.