@bgriffin wrote:
Interesting. I uploaded the same photo to two shops accidentally. They invalidated the second (correct) shop because I had already uploaded one of the photos to another shop. Sent an email with the correct photo and told them the invalidated shop was actually correct. Got paid for both. Not sure why you're having a problem unless you're being hard to get along with and/or not explaining the situation correctly.
@SoCalMama wrote:
That’s how Market force works. They often invalidate everything if they don’t trust that you’re reliable.
@JASFLALMT wrote:
Do you name your photos with the location name?
They don't like mistakes.@johnb974 wrote:
@SoCalMama wrote:
That’s how Market force works. They often invalidate everything if they don’t trust that you’re reliable.
LOL now that is funny, but it is a comment I expect from you. I have done 100's of shop for them. No reason for them NOT to trust me.
@johnb974 wrote:
@JASFLALMT wrote:
Do you name your photos with the location name?
The first shop was done right, no problem with the photos. The second shop I forgot to post one picture of one pump, which I had. I made the mistake of using a photo from the first shop. If they don't want to accept the second shop, that's fine. There's no reason for them to invalidate the first shop. There was nothing wrong with it. It appears some schedulers will do anything they can NOT to pay you.
@JASFLALMT wrote:
While I agree with that, you aren't the first and won't be the last. They have a low tolerance for mistakes. It's best to not make any.
@JASFLALMT wrote:
While I agree with that, you aren't the first and won't be the last. They have a low tolerance for mistakes. It's best to not make any.
@bgriffin wrote:
Uh. They're all simple shops.
@bgriffin wrote:
I'm sure they're concerned. Don't you live in LA where there are approximately 562,000 shoppers?
@shopperbob wrote:
There are, to me, two morals to this situation. One, that MF, who fired me nine years ago, is a stickler; be extra careful should you decide to accept their jobs. If you do err, accept that is part of business. Two, the greater number of pics required, the greater the chance of error. Unless one is truly desperate for money, avoid those shops at the original posted money. My last was in a burg so small, it did not have a traffic light and I was driving a block away on non-shopping business; my fee, two years ago, was $47. Obviously, few desire to pay me, but that is OK with me as I am neither in need nor willing to work to help out.
@Ms.Baker wrote:
I shopped MF for 10 years with hundreds of shops, until this happened to me also...
Ten years meant nothing to them....and my photo was NOT submitted as a photo for the report, but one of ALL pictures for that report.
@Goneshopping wrote:
John974, your reports probably went into audit and their system took over and automatically rejected both jobs. Once the report is in audit, they are unable to help you. I made a major mistake but caught it in time and emailed them about it. They told me they were able to help me correct the mistake since my report had not gone into audit yet.