.

.

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/05/2022 04:22AM by hello232.

Create an Account or Log In

Membership is free. Simply choose your username, type in your email address, and choose a password. You immediately get full access to the forum.

Already a member? Log In.

What was the reason for the denial? How do you know they are sending the photos to the client?
Both are valid questions, but unfortunately, I have shared as much as possible here because it is an ongoing matter. The purpose of my post is to let others know that they are not alone if they feel this situation sounds familiar.
I haven't had any problems with any of mine. I did do 3 go backs that someone else had done. One go back I did the store manager said that the previous person only took 2 pictures then left.
.

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/05/2022 04:24AM by hello232.
No issues on the 2 I completed other than responding to a couple of simple edits.
I did a fast food de-branding audit this week, to make sure all the logos/signage were gone. Took about 12 photos. It was *NICELY* bonused, too! It all went through and was approved, and I'm expecting payment next Tuesday.
I plead with you to check your contract as an IC. You are generally prohibited from contacting the client.

Besides, we often do not know who the end client is -- it could easily be a competitor!
I just did a de-brand this week. I haven't worked with this company in forever but am hoping I don't run into issues. The pay that was in the email was not what was on the project they assigned me and they quickly took care of that for me.
hello, don't contact the client.

Find out what went wrong and offer to fix it.

"I told myself to quit you; but I don't listen to drunks." -Chris Stapleton
Many yrs. ago, I accepted a job from an MSC to open an account; there was a list of three or four from which to choose. I decided a CD would be best for me, completed the report and awaited my pay. I am guessing I did not contact the company until two months had elapsed. My inquiry was quickly answered with the explanation I would not be paid due to scheduler error, as a CD was not acceptable. My response was that their scheduler's error was not my concern and that if my pay were not forthcoming, I would seek the assistance of my new bank, who was also their client. My money quickly arrived that day by PayPal, even though they had always paid me by check.

The problem with contacting a client, is that you ruin the relationship and, as has been noted, you violate your agreement. but I have never, for a second, regretted my position. In the event anyone is wondering, I immediately became a shopping persona non grata with that company.
I see these posted as reshops. The instructions say you will be taking some exterior photos that were missed in the original shop. So this does raise some interesting questions. Are they denying the original shop but still using some of the photos and submitting them to the client along with the photos from the reshop? Ethically this seems wrong not to pay the original shopper something. Hope I’m wrong in my assumptions.
@kenasch wrote:

I see these posted as reshops. The instructions say you will be taking some exterior photos that were missed in the original shop. So this does raise some interesting questions. Are they denying the original shop but still using some of the photos and submitting them to the client along with the photos from the reshop? Ethically this seems wrong not to pay the original shopper something. Hope I’m wrong in my assumptions.

It depends on how much they have to redo. They typically pay a little bit but withhold some of fee if they have to send somebody else out.
@foodluvr wrote:

@kenasch wrote:

I see these posted as reshops. The instructions say you will be taking some exterior photos that were missed in the original shop. So this does raise some interesting questions. Are they denying the original shop but still using some of the photos and submitting them to the client along with the photos from the reshop? Ethically this seems wrong not to pay the original shopper something. Hope I’m wrong in my assumptions.

It depends on how much they have to redo. They typically pay a little bit but withhold some of fee if they have to send somebody else out.

I was referring to the original poster who said they were denied payment. I assume they did not receive anything for their shop.
I’m just posting again because I don’t see this thread as current. Not sure if it was deleted somehow.
Now I see hello232, the OP, deleted the title of the post and their post itself.

Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/05/2022 04:20PM by kenasch.
ken....that is EXACTLY what they are doing. All the major MSC's have been guilty of this, at one time or another.
In another life, my company owned all or part of, several restaurant groups....believe me...this happens.
I'm curious how you know what report gets used by the client; whether the report was accepted or denied.

A lot of disgruntled shoppers claim their rejected reports are used by the MSCs, but where is the proof? And why would the MSC post the shop again?

"I told myself to quit you; but I don't listen to drunks." -Chris Stapleton
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login