Interesting. I submitted a report and she returned it in under 30 minutes (which has to be an editing world record) with about two dozen clarification questions. Everything she was asking was either already in my narratives or not asked for in the report/guidelines. The quick turnaround + non-pertinent questions really made me think she hadn't read the report at all. So I waited and resubmitted it without any changes. Couple hours later she returns it to me with only two clarification questions. So either she just actually read the report and realized most of her questions were redundant or she still hasn't read the report and just assumed I made changes because I resubmitted it.
Her final two questions were not things required in the report or guidelines but she insisted they were "mandatory" for the client (I've done this same report multiple times for ACL and know the guidelines pretty well and no other ACL editor has asked for what she was asking). So I added her extra info and she accepted the report but not without a snarky comment that next time I needed to follow the guidelines better.
Since she's not new and should know better, I don't know if its worth saying something to ACL. Are they receptive to feedback like that? Generally I like them and haven't had a problem with anyone else there.