Liked by: bestofbothworlds, little_lucy, Shop-et-al
@shopperbob wrote:
One of my posts was deleted due to a moderator stating the following:
You have mentioned an MSC in a thread where multiple Clients have been mentioned, whether or not the MSC is involved any longer with those Clients. Post removed for violation of Posting Guidelines, naming client and MSC in the same thread. Feel free to edit, removing the violation, then repost.
Bob;s comment--The non-MSC I stated was Maritz, but never mentioned the name of the client nor was the client's name inserted by another poster.
@Curious99 wrote:
@shopperbob wrote:
One of my posts was deleted due to a moderator stating the following:
You have mentioned an MSC in a thread where multiple Clients have been mentioned, whether or not the MSC is involved any longer with those Clients. Post removed for violation of Posting Guidelines, naming client and MSC in the same thread. Feel free to edit, removing the violation, then repost.
Bob;s comment--The non-MSC I stated was Maritz, but never mentioned the name of the client nor was the client's name inserted by another poster.
Honestly, I think that's a bit ridiculous. If a mystery shopping company is no longer involved with a particular client, it shouldn't be a violation of anything to name them. It's because of stuff like that, that I seldom participate on this forum. I don't agree with the rules of the forum, but realize that if I post on it, that I have to follow them regardless of how inane they might be.
Liked by: Shop-et-al
Liked by: guysmom, Shop-et-al, racdsmith, BirdyC, Madetoshop
@BusyBeeBuzzBuzzBuzz wrote:
An MSC can lose a client and then regain it after a while. If MSC #1 acquires MSC #2, MSC #1 often also acquires MSC #2's clients.
Liked by: Shop-et-al
@Morledzep wrote:
Maritz isn't an MSC anymore. They have been defunct for well over a year now. Maybe I'm wrong (I usually am), but I don't see the harm in naming an MSC that doesn't exist anymore.
Liked by: walesmaven