1. Forums
  2. General Chat

Legal- Female Gratification

February 13, 2011 05:29AM
I asked my attorney about these editors and how they correct our reports. He laughed and said to keep my originals for 24 months. He said that an editor can change all of my grammer and wording and even be sued for docking pay or ratings because I reported things in my own words.

He said not to be worried about ratings or future shops.

I was so thankful of this advice that I set him up with a female who is kinda free spirited. I know this because she has brought the ball back to me many times and panted. Sure, she may be a Labrador, but she loves rides in a convertible and absolutely adores a steak dinner with lobster!
Reply
Log In
x

Create an Account or Log In

Membership is free. Simply choose your username, type in your email address, and choose a password. You immediately get full access to the forum.

Already a member? Log In.

February 13, 2011 11:02PM
Is it only me who is missing the point here?
Reply
February 13, 2011 11:41PM
The OP asked his attorney about the independant contractor/editor relationship. The attorney told the OP that he should keep copies of his reports that he turns in, as he could sue the editor for a low rating or if his pay is docked, especially if the editor changed any of the OPs wording or content of his report.

The OP then makes a "joke" about fixing up the attorney with a "free-spirited" women (which I assume means that the women is open with her 'favors' if you know what I mean) in return - the joke is that the women is not human, but is really a dog.

In sum, while there might have been (arguably) a point, it isn't one that I find particularly helpful (as I disagree with the attorney's "advice"winking smiley or funny (in the case of the joke). I love me some veiled humor - don't get me wrong, but the whole dog/women joke is tired IMHO.
Reply
February 13, 2011 11:58PM
Personally, I don't think there was a point, other than to create a scenario to fit the "joke" into the post, and IMHO, a very unrealistic one.

I could be way off, but I'm starting to think that richraynor's purpose for being on the board may be to yank some chains and push some buttons.
Reply
February 14, 2011 12:12AM
Really now...does anyone ever secure legal counsel over a $20 shop?

My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me.
Benjamin Disraeli
Reply
February 14, 2011 12:24AM
My opinion, the 'point' was humor. Again, just my opinion ~ lighten up.
Reply
February 14, 2011 02:31PM
Rich is just acting like a troll. This is not the first time. His post, if it belongs anywhere, belongs in the "Everything Else" area. Jason, are you listening in?

Based in MD, near DC
Shopping from the Carolinas to New York
Have video cam; will travel

Poor customer service? Don't get mad; get video.
Reply
February 15, 2011 02:38PM
Who's Jason? I thought the owner was Jacob...
Reply
February 15, 2011 04:03PM
My apologies. I meant Jacob. Reading Rich's posts must have left me a bit cross-eyed!

Based in MD, near DC
Shopping from the Carolinas to New York
Have video cam; will travel

Poor customer service? Don't get mad; get video.
Reply
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login