Not only CAN the company be identified, I think it SHOULD be identified. The reason I think the company should be identified is that the best thing we posters can do for other forum members and the shopping community is to identify the MSCs who do not pay on time, have payment difficulties, do not pay the correct amount, or - heaven forbid! - do not pay at all. Because posters here on the forum were willing to identify payment problems with Franchise Compliance and Freeman, many shoppers who read this forum regularly were saved from making the mistake of unknowingly accepting assignments. It was a valuable warning - both companies appear to no longer be in business, leaving many unsuspecting shoppers owed a lot of money.
A problem with double-payment and then re-payment and then a wrong 1099 is not as serious, certainly, as a chronic no-pay or late-pay company, but the warning might allow other shoppers to determine whether to hesitate a little before working for the company due to its history.
Many new shoppers want a list of the best companies. I think learning the ones that have problems and/or those to avoid is much more valuable.