HEARING AID SHOPS: Which msc's are doing them please???
Warning: For Full Access Please Log In or Create an Account (Free)
I just saw one. I'm not sure with which MSC. It was one I don't work for too much; Bare, iSecret. I'll keep looking
The one out there now is NOT an ENT.... It is an doc that is NOT ENT.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/22/2017 01:19AM by CANADAMOMMY.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/22/2017 01:19AM by CANADAMOMMY.
And Arch you fill well now NOT to ask who shops WHOM<<<<< Didnt we have this exact same discussion last month and the month before and the month before that? go fiND them easter egg hunt on your own.
I think I'm signed up with 200ish mystery shopping companies (I think there are like 250 total on the official list down below), and I live in one of the biggest deaf/hoh areas (Rochester NY), and I have never seen a hearing aid shop on the boards (I barely see regular shops on the boards lol).
Since the client is not being named, it's perfectly okay to say Second to None has hearing test shops in the board right now.
Go ahead and give Arch some more companies and shops too.... he knows far better than to ask..... Great Job arch you beat the system again.
@whiterosie wrote:
Since the client is not being named, it's perfectly okay to say Second to None has hearing test shops in the board right now.
Why the hostility? He asked a question that is allowed to be asked. There are no violations.
Arch full well knows the rules of not asking who shops who..
He asks, gets by with it and the answer is given.
He hopes someone will give it before it is noticed or edited.
Congrats he got his answer. Want to help him Out some more with other companies too?
archquote=whiterosie]
Why the hostility? He asked a question that is allowed to be asked. There are no violations.[/quote]
He asks, gets by with it and the answer is given.
He hopes someone will give it before it is noticed or edited.
Congrats he got his answer. Want to help him Out some more with other companies too?
archquote=whiterosie]
Why the hostility? He asked a question that is allowed to be asked. There are no violations.[/quote]
I agree that no one should ask who shops Italian Garden, Darden restaurants, Arby's, or any other specific client. Responding to that would be an ICA violation. If Arch's request were more specific, for example, "who the the hearing aid shops in Stanford, MA, that pay for a hearing aid and require you have 3 objections?" that would require a violation to answer.
Asking who does hearing aid shops or who does grocery stores or who does hardware stores is not a violation. There are many MSCs that do all of those types of shops and they vary by location.
CANADAMOMMY, I share your annoyance with those who ask for ICA violations. I even object to thinly veiled ICA violations, like using cute names that everyone will recognize for a client when naming the MSC. Arch has gotten around that by carefully working his request. We get that you are irritated at Arch and at his question, but IMHO this is not a violation.
Asking who does hearing aid shops or who does grocery stores or who does hardware stores is not a violation. There are many MSCs that do all of those types of shops and they vary by location.
CANADAMOMMY, I share your annoyance with those who ask for ICA violations. I even object to thinly veiled ICA violations, like using cute names that everyone will recognize for a client when naming the MSC. Arch has gotten around that by carefully working his request. We get that you are irritated at Arch and at his question, but IMHO this is not a violation.
WOW !!! Did not realize when posting my message WITH NO ICA VIOLATIONS that certain folks would still wet their pants....how truly pathetic.....and if they are still so damn offended, then by all means go to the nearest courthouse make your civil or criminal complaint against me, now please.
You have to admit your description of the former client is spot on even if you did not include the name. Unless someone recently beamed down or time traveled from the distant past, everyone knows who it is, LOL.
Equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. It's not pie.
"I prefer someone who burns the flag and then wraps themselves up in the Constitution over someone who burns the Constitution and then wraps themselves up in the flag." -Molly Ivins
Never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of your time and it really annoys the pig.
"I prefer someone who burns the flag and then wraps themselves up in the Constitution over someone who burns the Constitution and then wraps themselves up in the flag." -Molly Ivins
Never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of your time and it really annoys the pig.
You would think I had said something offensive about somebody's mother here with my posting and their anger charged comments in response....get the sense that some folks may have deep rooted emotional anger issues and are better suited to be corrections officers instead of mystery shoppers...
Arch, I wish you wouldn't say "some" folks when it was "one" folks
Equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. It's not pie.
"I prefer someone who burns the flag and then wraps themselves up in the Constitution over someone who burns the Constitution and then wraps themselves up in the flag." -Molly Ivins
Never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of your time and it really annoys the pig.
"I prefer someone who burns the flag and then wraps themselves up in the Constitution over someone who burns the Constitution and then wraps themselves up in the flag." -Molly Ivins
Never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of your time and it really annoys the pig.
So true LisaSTL, but then the moderator could ban me had I said "one" as opposed to "some." Correct ???
To that question, I do not have a definitive answer. Although, it seems highly unlikely.
Equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. It's not pie.
"I prefer someone who burns the flag and then wraps themselves up in the Constitution over someone who burns the Constitution and then wraps themselves up in the flag." -Molly Ivins
Never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of your time and it really annoys the pig.
"I prefer someone who burns the flag and then wraps themselves up in the Constitution over someone who burns the Constitution and then wraps themselves up in the flag." -Molly Ivins
Never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of your time and it really annoys the pig.
@Arch Stanton wrote:
So true LisaSTL, but then the moderator could ban me had I said "one" as opposed to "some." Correct ???
Completely NOT correct IMHO, Arch. I am guessing you don't mean "ban" you mean moderate, as in the moderator would edit your post. Making an innocuous factual statement correctly stating one person rather than incorrectly stating some persons would certainly not get anyone banned. A verbal attack on that one person might result in the moderator editing your post to remove the personal attack, but if you had made a personal attack (which you did not), and the moderator would edit it whether you said "one" or "some."
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.