I had a very difficult shop rejected because I failed to get a few of the employees names. First of all, I explained why I didn't get the names of 3 employees (2 out of the 3 that didn't have name tags) and the 3rd one's name tag was obscured. The guidelines didn't indicate that if I didn't get names my shop would be rejected. There was only one thing that gave that indication, which I did do. What's also frustrating - was that 3rd employee, had I not happened to look up when I did, I would never have even saw them. So while I would never ever do this because its unethical and dishonest.... I really wanted to say "So basically what you are saying is that I should have left that interaction off of the report, because you would never have known that I actually interacted with that 3rd person (and while it was an expected interaction it was not a required interaction)."
*sigh*
*sigh*