For the past 2-3 years, I have audio recorded every shop that I do to verify what I put in my reports is accurate. It is sad that it has come to this that companies being shopped will protest a written report. When I tell the proofreader that I have recorded the session, and I am willing to provide it to the client, they never have another question...
But... I did a visit to an assisted living shop. I recorded the pre-visit call and the hour-long interaction with the sales associate that included a tour. I also recorded the follow-up phone call from the Executive Director. Now, the proofreader (guess which company would be asking for more details)... wants to know all the questions asked and all the answers I provided.
Now, the company didn't ask or pay for an audio recording to insure that all questions asked and answers provided were 100% accurate.
What do I owe that company, who is noted for overbearing and unconscionable conduct from their proofreaders. I offered a full transcription, but I said it would take hours to transcribe, and I brought it to their attention that the instructions did not specify that all questions and all answers had to be provided.
What would you do? I think I may flake on this, because this company has a very long history of proofreaders that should have been fired years ago and replaced with people who have communication skills.... It sometimes just isn't worth the trouble for the pay that is provided on shops. This is such a case.
I had a previous problem a couple years ago with the same company, where the $100 shop was returned to me by the proofreader for more information, where the proofreader appeared to have more knowledge about the shop than I did, and I was the one present at the location. I told the company to send their proofreader out to do the shop... and I refused to change anything on my report, so they invalidated my report, and didn't pay me, which is fine. But I believe 100%, that they used my report without paying me, which is what they would do here again.
Some MSC's have no shame. Some proofreaders.... still need to be fired and replace with people who aren't internet bullies.
Comments please? Anyone else have these types of problems? Where proofreaders what all questions and all answers provided without paying for an audio shop?
I'm editing this to add, that my initial report was 100+ yes/no questions and the narrative was almost 1800 words in length.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/24/2017 04:39PM by Ms.Baker.
But... I did a visit to an assisted living shop. I recorded the pre-visit call and the hour-long interaction with the sales associate that included a tour. I also recorded the follow-up phone call from the Executive Director. Now, the proofreader (guess which company would be asking for more details)... wants to know all the questions asked and all the answers I provided.
Now, the company didn't ask or pay for an audio recording to insure that all questions asked and answers provided were 100% accurate.
What do I owe that company, who is noted for overbearing and unconscionable conduct from their proofreaders. I offered a full transcription, but I said it would take hours to transcribe, and I brought it to their attention that the instructions did not specify that all questions and all answers had to be provided.
What would you do? I think I may flake on this, because this company has a very long history of proofreaders that should have been fired years ago and replaced with people who have communication skills.... It sometimes just isn't worth the trouble for the pay that is provided on shops. This is such a case.
I had a previous problem a couple years ago with the same company, where the $100 shop was returned to me by the proofreader for more information, where the proofreader appeared to have more knowledge about the shop than I did, and I was the one present at the location. I told the company to send their proofreader out to do the shop... and I refused to change anything on my report, so they invalidated my report, and didn't pay me, which is fine. But I believe 100%, that they used my report without paying me, which is what they would do here again.
Some MSC's have no shame. Some proofreaders.... still need to be fired and replace with people who aren't internet bullies.
Comments please? Anyone else have these types of problems? Where proofreaders what all questions and all answers provided without paying for an audio shop?
I'm editing this to add, that my initial report was 100+ yes/no questions and the narrative was almost 1800 words in length.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/24/2017 04:39PM by Ms.Baker.