I always download a copy of the report questions. Then I can see in advance the number of questions, how many are open ended that require narratives. Doing that has saved me a lot of grief!
@spicy1 wrote:
What great advice.
@mathemend2 wrote:
Hehe...I think I know that pizza mystery shop. I’ve done several same pizza shops with them and everytime I submit reports the annoying editors would always nit pick on small details. The last one asked me to re time everything from the start and asked me how the hell I managed to time the shop. Good for me I keep covert recordings of these pizza shops bec theres no way you can use a timer then interact with the one making ur pizza. I told her my shop is 99.9% accurate and asked if she wanted proof I can send it to her. She still asked me to re time but did not make a comment after.
@SoCalMama wrote:
@MFJohnston wrote:
* Sign up for more companies. If you are not seeing shops advertised for more than $20, you are missing some good MSC's.
This.
Also, do a great job on every report. Most of the best jobs never hit the job boards. When they need shoppers, they just directly contact those who have done great work. Some of the worst paying companies are hiding their best shops.
@KaliAri wrote:
I always download a copy of the report questions. Then I can see in advance the number of questions, how many are open ended that require narratives. Doing that has saved me a lot of grief!
@KaliAri wrote:
I always download a copy of the report questions. Then I can see in advance the number of questions, how many are open ended that require narratives. Doing that has saved me a lot of grief!
@TroyHawkins wrote:
Phone shops aren’t a regular thing. IntelliShop has them occasionally, as does Cirrus. Ellis has some, but requires 50 on site shops completed first.
I find companies who use Sassie to be easiest, because you can filter for the type of shop and search 999 miles from a zip code.
If you search the forum, you’ll find threads about a few companies that offer call center shops. But those are also project based and havevery limited offerings.
@Pro Evals-Audits wrote:
I've tried to see it as "paying my dues," but I am still not getting to the secret inner circle that seems to allow for these better paying assignments. I really like this work, but can't logically keep investing so much for so little in return.
@johnb974 wrote:
@KaliAri wrote:
I always download a copy of the report questions. Then I can see in advance the number of questions, how many are open ended that require narratives. Doing that has saved me a lot of grief!
With many shops you cannot see the questions until you accept the shop. Than you have to cancel if you don't like the report.
@bgriffin wrote:
@johnb974 wrote:
@KaliAri wrote:
I always download a copy of the report questions. Then I can see in advance the number of questions, how many are open ended that require narratives. Doing that has saved me a lot of grief!
With many shops you cannot see the questions until you accept the shop. Than you have to cancel if you don't like the report.
Or you could be proactive and ask to see the report before accepting the shop........
@bgriffin wrote:
@Pro Evals-Audits wrote:
I've tried to see it as "paying my dues," but I am still not getting to the secret inner circle that seems to allow for these better paying assignments. I really like this work, but can't logically keep investing so much for so little in return.
From your post it sounds to me like there are a few things you've done wrong.
Not every company has better shops. Not every company values great shoppers. Your job, as a shopper, is to evaluate which companies are which. Otherwise you keep spinning you wheels doing crap jobs for crap pay. It sounds like you've done a poor job of that. Don't feel bad, most shoppers do.
Secondly, it sounds like instead of being a go to shopper you've become a "this shopper will do anything for practically nothing" shopper. That's not the way to do it. How to flip that script is up to you to figure out.
About once a year I go off on a tirade about this subject and I guess today is when I do another round. Be proactive. That's the number 1 way to be successful in this business. And honestly most businesses.
I'm going to give an example. A few months ago I was planning a route. I noticed a shop on a company's board that I found interesting. This was a pretty decent sized MSC that I have never worked for. I also knew from other job boards that this particular location was hard to schedule because other companies had shops in this location with bonuses. So I proactively emailed the scheduler, told her I was going to be on a route and that I was interested in the shop but wasn't able to do it at that fee. I gave her a strong reason why. I also told her that fairly often I was in places with these shops and would be interested in taking a larger amount of them when available. She gave me the bonus I was interested in. She emailed me with a question, I can't remember what, when I was literally at the shop. So I replied with a laugh, told her I was there, answered her question. Then I told her I had a long drive after that shop as I had car trouble on the route and had to return the loaner car and pick up my car. She immediately replied and said not to stress over the report that she would just push the due date out a day for me. I didn't ask about the report, it was something that came up naturally in the conversation. The next month the shops for that client came late, but had they appeared the beginning of the month like usual she would have given me half a dozen of them.
1 shop. Not only have I established myself as a shopper she wants to work with, but I have identified a scheduler who values shoppers.
Sometimes it takes 20 interactions for something like this to happen. Which reminds me of something someone told me one time. If you ask 100 women to go home with you, 1 of them will.
@Pro Evals-Audits wrote:
Lately I find myself trying to explain to schedulers why it doesn't make sense for me to spend 12 hours on the road, traveling 400+ miles to complete six $12 assignments for them. Or for another why I really can't drive 600+ miles to complete ten $10 assignments that all have to be done between 9 am - 4 pm, especially since I have to call before I go and make sure they will all be open/there and then when I get home, I have to complete narrative heavy reports that take 2 hours each and are due within 12 hours of completing the shop.
@Pro Evals-Audits wrote:
I do appreciate them reaching out to me before these hit the board (been working hard to try to get to that point), but not sure why it makes sense to the MSC or the client to pay so little for such random and far apart assignments.
@TroyHawkins wrote:
@Pro Evals-Audits wrote:
Lately I find myself trying to explain to schedulers why it doesn't make sense for me to spend 12 hours on the road, traveling 400+ miles to complete six $12 assignments for them. Or for another why I really can't drive 600+ miles to complete ten $10 assignments that all have to be done between 9 am - 4 pm, especially since I have to call before I go and make sure they will all be open/there and then when I get home, I have to complete narrative heavy reports that take 2 hours each and are due within 12 hours of completing the shop.
Emails to schedulers should be short and to-the-point. All that matters is "I can do this shop on this date for $$$." Preferably, that's also the subject line. No need to explain why you want a higher fee, all the difficulties you see with the location or how long the report will take you. Schedulers receive hundreds if not thousands of emails every day. Make it as easy as possible for them to quickly read and understand your email. Otherwise, it will be archived and they will look at the next one.
@TroyHawkins wrote:
Try not to think of schedulers in terms of "good" and "not-so-good" based on how responsive they are to your emails. Think of you emails in terms of how effective they are at getting a response.
@TroyHawkins wrote:
@Pro Evals-Audits wrote:
I do appreciate them reaching out to me before these hit the board (been working hard to try to get to that point), but not sure why it makes sense to the MSC or the client to pay so little for such random and far apart assignments.
Shop pay depends on the scope of work agreed to between the MSC and their client. What we can see on job boards is not enough to determine why fees are set they way they are. But here's an example:
A client has 10 stores in a region. They contract an MSC to complete 100 shops throughout the region with a minimum of 5 an maximum of 20 per store. That location off in the distance that's still on your job board for a low fee? It's already been shopped at least 5 times. Any additional shops at that location just add to the total needed for the entire district. They don't need to offer a bonus for that location. But it will remain visible on the job board until they get 20 shops completed there or they reach 100 total for the district. In this example, there could a location in a more populated area that might not have 5 shops yet. If they're close enough to reaching 100 overall, the MSC would add a bonus to attract a few more shoppers to that location and meet the quota without going over the 100 shop total.
Pretty much any shop you see that's a chain store/restaurant is set up like this. When you see those out of the way locations start getting bonuses, that's when you make an offer. Otherwise, they are getting enough shops done that they have no reason to pay extra.
@TroyHawkins wrote:
Most of the scheduler emails we get asking for shoppers are not because they can't find anyone. They are because MSC's want to get shop projects completed well before their deadline so they don't have to offer huge bonuses on the last day. Just like you want to do with your emails, they are trying to get your attention. They know we all get dozens and hundreds of scheduler emails. They are competing for your attention with schedulers from every other MSC. They are also blasting those emails out to hundreds of shoppers at a time. Try not to think of it as "begging". It's marketing.