@JASFLALMT wrote:
OMG have you tried those Reese's sticks?
I am trying to give as many of them away as I can (I probably had 100 of the candy bars not long ago). I was mailing them to my cousin in Phoenix but now it's too hot to ship candy there or to my friends in Florida. Having them in my pantry is hard. I am being pretty good, I probably only ate 10 packages of them in the past 3 months, LOL. I am thinking that they would make a great milkshake with some vanilla ice cream, though.
@kimmiemae wrote:
Have you tried chocolate covered Nutter Butters?
@JASFLALMT wrote:
OMG have you tried those Reese's sticks?
@Jenny Cassada wrote:
@BirdyC I used to live outside Philly, it's a great area and so nice to be close to bigger cities on the NJ/PA border.

@JASFLALMT wrote:
No...but I have about 50 king size Reese's Sticks left. It was a purchase requirement at some convenience stores I did for the last couple of months. It was that or some sports drink thing. I have a lot of those, too. But I prefer chocolateI am trying to give as many of them away as I can (I probably had 100 of the candy bars not long ago). I was mailing them to my cousin in Phoenix but now it's too hot to ship candy there or to my friends in Florida. Having them in my pantry is hard. I am being pretty good, I probably only ate 10 packages of them in the past 3 months, LOL. I am thinking that they would make a great milkshake with some vanilla ice cream, though.
@kimmiemae wrote:
Have you tried chocolate covered Nutter Butters?
@JASFLALMT wrote:
OMG have you tried those Reese's sticks?
@rickgrossman wrote:
They can still keep under the limit and be paid more per hour....then work fewer hours.
@BirdyC wrote:
Being near KOP opens up the mall boutique and upscale store shops, which I've always wanted to do, but I'm 1 1/2 hours away now, and can never put together a route that's worth the drive.
@sandyf wrote:
I had the same thought you did. I do not understand why someone trying to stay under a certain $ amt to keep benefits would be better off taking low pay jobs. If there is a reimbursement attached to it then in my mind it is not necessarily a low paying job. A fee of $3,4,or 5 is definitely a low paying job but if it is with a $20 reimbursement for something I need or want then to me it is not a low paying job at $3. That is a very different thing. Unless the person on benefits has to report 40 hours of work a week and just cannot type slowly enough to claim that, like I could, I do not see benefits as a reason to take a job that pays $3 an hour. If you are in an area with only $3 jobs that could be a reason. The benefits story has nothing to do with job availability in your area. And if you are bored after meeting your benefit max earnings you can volunteer somewhere.
\@rickgrossman wrote:
They can still keep under the limit and be paid more per hour....then work fewer hours.
@maryanncostello wrote:
Have you had much success going direct to merchants?
@shoptastic wrote:
Although, I do wonder if just volunteering wouldn't be more fulfilling?
@shoptastic wrote:
b.) These people are bored seniors, as many people on this forum have offered as a reason.***
As for b.), I really wish these bored seniors would watch TV, play bridge, volunteer locally, etc. vs. taking on mystery shopping jobs to fill their time. If there really are that many bored seniors willing to work for pennies, then maybe they can take up a new cause of fighting for higher wages of this work instead.Maybe volunteer for Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren or something.
Although, I do wonder if just volunteering wouldn't be more fulfilling?
@Shop-et-al wrote:
Thus, I have only one question: when did anyone start thinking that my mystery shops and my entire life are their business?
Time for peach melba.
Post removed. No personal attacks or insults. Add a positive contribution.