In real life, people's movements and the focus of their attention give clues that allow a reasonable judgement call to be made. We see where their eyes go. Are they keeping track of what's happening with the line? Or just concentrating on their tape, addressing, or conversation? Do they inch up as people are served, or just stay put and keep writing or talking? Are they together / arrive together, or just chatting with a random stranger as they stand in line? Without that input the nuance is lost. It's just not possible to reliably gauge the person's intent with a still image. These tests should use a brief video clip instead.
The judgement calls are near impossible in 2D. We all end up guessing or asking the scheduler what we did wrong. That's probably a test of something but has no relationship to the number of waiting customers. They should skip the question, or allow it be thoughtfully answered based a real life video.
@MisterBill wrote:
@sandyf wrote:
I finally passed on the third try but previously have always gotten it for years on the first try. I thought the person in line right in front of me could have been waiting. I could not see if she was doing something at the table. It looked like she had just put her envelope down while she waited!!!
I've always passed on the first attempt as well. It was very poorly done, or intentionally confusing. Those two women should have been at a table not right next to the line. I thought one of them was on line and had put the box on the table to avoid holding it. And the other one seemed to be holding tape to purchase. And what was the guy doing standing at a station if there is no clerk there?