Editor job
Warning: For Full Access Please Log In or Create an Account (Free)
The cons are the same as for shoppers: little pay, little respect from many MSCs. Add little respect from many shoppers too. The advantage is not having to actually engage in shopping
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/31/2021 03:32PM by Rousseau.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/31/2021 03:32PM by Rousseau.
Like This
Liked by: Shop-et-al, sestrahelena, RobinMarie
There were some old threads about it but I can't find them. There are definitely challenges, though, such as reports that are so badly written that you can barely make out the meaning and shoppers not responding when clarifications are needed.
sestrahelena
Like This
Liked by: Logansmom04, Shop-et-al, BirdyC, HonnyBrown
I always enjoyed it. My managers were great!
Like This
Liked by: Logansmom04, Shop-et-al, HonnyBrown
Litter [as in box?] pay? 
@Rousseau wrote:
The cons are the same as for shoppers: litter pay, little respect from many MSCs.
It will never rain roses: when we want to have more roses we must plant more trees. - George Eliot
____
I’ve noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born. - Ronald Reagan
_____
____
I’ve noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born. - Ronald Reagan
_____
I have only had a single conversation with a scheduler/editor concerning pay; she stated her MSC paid $1.95 a report.
Like This
Liked by: Logansmom04
I edited for a couple of years. The pay is low. I liked it because it made me more aware of what went into turning into a great shop. I did it more for the experience than the money. I edited long casino and hotel reports.
Like This
Liked by: BirdyC, Shop-et-al, RobinMarie, NShop, ColoKate63
Pros: You do not have to leave the house. You realize what makes a terrific shopper.
Cons: The pay is low. Every company has different requirements and believes their form of editing (grammar rules) is correct. You have to keep track of your work to ensure you are paid correctly. The flow of work is inconsistent through the month/quarters.
Cons: The pay is low. Every company has different requirements and believes their form of editing (grammar rules) is correct. You have to keep track of your work to ensure you are paid correctly. The flow of work is inconsistent through the month/quarters.
Evaluating and mailing packages since 1994
Like This
Liked by: Shop-et-al, BirdyC
There will never be enough money to compensate editors adequately for dealing with my reports.
It will never rain roses: when we want to have more roses we must plant more trees. - George Eliot
____
I’ve noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born. - Ronald Reagan
_____
____
I’ve noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born. - Ronald Reagan
_____
Like This
Liked by: Rousseau, sbobgal, BirdyC, dorbradley, ewalsh, Logansmom04, Izzy, RobinMarie
@Shop-et-al wrote:
There will never be enough money to compensate editors adequately for dealing with my reports.
I don't believe that for a minute!
I learn something new every day, but not everyday!
I've learned to never trust spell-check or my phone's auto-fill feature.
I've learned to never trust spell-check or my phone's auto-fill feature.
Like This
Liked by: walesmaven, Shop-et-al
I did and was let go because they feel I did not edit to their standards. The pay is low and they nit pick about everything that you do.
Like This
Liked by: Shop-et-al
There. You see? Editors might deserve hazard pay. I believe they do.
It will never rain roses: when we want to have more roses we must plant more trees. - George Eliot
____
I’ve noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born. - Ronald Reagan
_____
____
I’ve noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born. - Ronald Reagan
_____
Like This
Liked by: BirdyC, Logansmom04, CA senior
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.