I did one of these at Hard Rock several years ago. The main issue was that the background noise in the restaurant was so loud that it was next to impossible to hear what I needed to hear in order to fill out the report. As with most dine-in shops, it was way too much work for the job fee offered. I never did another, although I have shopped Hard Rock casino/resorts since then.@Tarantado wrote:
It’s similar to the MSC that previously had this client.
It’s OK if you want to experience Hard Rock Cafe for little pay.
Having said that, once you’ve experienced it, I don’t find myself wanting to work for my meal and a couple of drinks.
@AZwolfman wrote:
I did one of these at Hard Rock several years ago. The main issue was that the background noise in the restaurant was so loud that it was next to impossible to hear what I needed to hear in order to fill out the report. As with most dine-in shops, it was way too much work for the job fee offered. I never did another, although I have shopped Hard Rock casino/resorts since then.@Tarantado wrote:
It’s similar to the MSC that previously had this client.
It’s OK if you want to experience Hard Rock Cafe for little pay.
Having said that, once you’ve experienced it, I don’t find myself wanting to work for my meal and a couple of drinks.
@AZwolfman wrote:
Then I think you are justified in shying away. Most dine-in shops are quite involved for the amount they pay. That's why I rarely do one unless it is required as part of a larger resort shop.
@AZwolfman wrote:
In addition to the amount of time invested relative to the small pay; there is a risk to reward ratio to consider. If I am fronting $120 for a future payment of only $15, I am laying 8 to 1 odds that I will successfully complete the shop and get paid. If the shop goes sour for whatever reason, I am out $135 for eating in a restaurant that I would never patronize or afford on my own mystery shopper salary.
Now, if I were getting paid $40 for that same shop, I would be laying only 3 to 1 odds that nothing would go wrong and invalidate the shop. I might go for those odds if the time required was not too extensive. Each shopper has to decide what odds he/she would accept.
The homeless may work for food; I work for cash.
@AZwolfman wrote:
I would not be interested in a shop where I had to lay $8 to get $1, but laying laying only $3 to get $1 might be more enticing. There would be greater reward for the risk.
Edit your post. You can't name the company & the client even if they are no longer shopped by that company.@Almudenaplr wrote:
Hi! I´ve done a couple of visits in the past and I enjoyed it! The reinbursement is fair and had a good experience. The report was nothing too difficult, it required lots of details though. The company was xxxxxx but they stopped having Hard Rock.
What is the company that you saw on your board?
Thanks.