@olympia tennenbaum wrote:
I haven't done one of these shops in a while. The dimension of 12x12x12 - does that mean 12+12+12 (36) total for length, width and depth? I'm wondering if I could use this shop for a 13x13x5 box since l+w+d=31 or of 12" in the absolute maximum the box can be in any one direction.
Thanks for any help!
@gene wrote:
12 by 12 by 12 or smaller any side
@Morledzep wrote:
The folks on the forum say so. But I have chosen not to tempt the editing goddesses into giving them a reason to deny my shop. No box I ship is ever more than 12" on any side.
@BirdyC wrote:
@olympia tennenbaum wrote:
I haven't done one of these shops in a while. The dimension of 12x12x12 - does that mean 12+12+12 (36) total for length, width and depth? I'm wondering if I could use this shop for a 13x13x5 box since l+w+d=31 or of 12" in the absolute maximum the box can be in any one direction.
Thanks for any help!
I think your 13 x 13 x 5 box should be fine, as it's less than the total volume of a 12 x 12 x 12 box, as @Capurato notes. I've mailed some boxes that had a longest dimension of maybe 14" or so and haven't had any issues.
I could swear that at one time there was a clarification from the MSC about this, and that was that as long as the cubic-inch total was equal to or less than the 12 x 12 x 12 box, it was OK. Except, for example, a long tube mailer. I don't remember when that was, and I don't see it in the current guidelines. Maybe it is or was in the quiz materials?
@condorchristi wrote:
Just an FYI about these.... I was told by someone at the big "I" that my shop was rejected because the picture I took was "after" the visit. I'm not sure how they came to that conclusion....something about meta-data??? Anyway, I sent in the picture of the box I used in the shop and a second box I used for a shop done on the same day. What I did do though was rotate the picture on the submission form (it came off my phone at an angle) it which I guess violated the meta-data thingy whatever. Point being...the the picture you take of the box before going into the post office; don't try to crop it; enhance it, or anything else; just submit it as is.
Thank you, Sandy! I did something similar as well which is why I figured it had to come down to a max cubic measurement. Thanks for taking the time@sandyf wrote:
I just went online at the postal service and input several different package sizes. As long as my box stayed under the 1738 cu in the price of my package remained at $17.05. even with a side that was 14 inches or 15 inches. When my total went over 1738 cubic inches by a few cubic inches suddenly the same weight package to the same zip code was $57.65.
That is why the rule is there. It is the total cubic inches that is important along with a correct weight.
@olympia tennenbaum wrote:
Thank you, Sandy! I did something similar as well which is why I figured it had to come down to a max cubic measurement. Thanks for taking the time@sandyf wrote:
I just went online at the postal service and input several different package sizes. As long as my box stayed under the 1738 cu in the price of my package remained at $17.05. even with a side that was 14 inches or 15 inches. When my total went over 1738 cubic inches by a few cubic inches suddenly the same weight package to the same zip code was $57.65.
That is why the rule is there. It is the total cubic inches that is important along with a correct weight.
@mjmariah13gmail.com wrote:
Hi! Is there a hint you could give as to which MSC does these shops? Thanks!
@myst4au wrote:
There are also clerks who either mis-measure or round up, so be careful. A 12 x 12 x 12 could end up being measured as 13 x 13 x 13. It has happened to me. That should not be a problem, but if the "measured" box volume means that you get charged for "imputed" weight, the price will skyrocket, which is what Sandy observed in their test calculations.@olympia tennenbaum wrote:
Thank you, Sandy! I did something similar as well which is why I figured it had to come down to a max cubic measurement. Thanks for taking the time@sandyf wrote:
I just went online at the postal service and input several different package sizes. As long as my box stayed under the 1738 cu in the price of my package remained at $17.05. even with a side that was 14 inches or 15 inches. When my total went over 1738 cubic inches by a few cubic inches suddenly the same weight package to the same zip code was $57.65.
That is why the rule is there. It is the total cubic inches that is important along with a correct weight.
@mjmariah13gmail.com wrote:
Hi! Is there a hint you could give as to which MSC does these shops? Thanks!
@sestrahelena wrote:
KingDouglas, how much was shipping to get the case of baking soda sent to you? I'm curious because shop pay is $12 (unless bonused) but you voluntarily reduced it to $10.71, and possibly more for that shipping by buying stuff and boxes. Boxes are free at most grocery stores or gas stations. Rocks are free and non-hazmat. Or a can of something you'll never use in the kitchen. Or books.
Not trying to pick at you. Not at all. Just trying to help you retain more of your pay. Please don't be offended!
@Morledzep wrote:
They will never reimburse for whatever you put into the boxes. Which is fine I spent $0.49 each on the canned goods that are in my boxes. The cans and the boxes have been all over the United States and back several times. The boxes get replaced periodically, like every fourth or fifth time they come back. Recently my son came across a big pile of dried beans in 2 lb bags in the trash cans (dumpster diving). As the need arises, when I change out boxes, I put 1 lb of the dried beans into a used zipper bag, and I put that into the new box that is going out.
I have been buying my boxes on Amazon in bundles of 25 or 50, depending on the size of the box. I have different sizes just to keep the mail people guessing, though I'm sure it's not necessary. And also for sending things to friends on One Way trips.
I don't jump through the receipt hoops anymore. I used to, until one of the editors decided that because my receipt was a year old it couldn't possibly be the actual receipt for the boxes that I was shipping. Because I bought a pack of 50 and every box makes at least five trips, so the receipt is old, in fact it's over 2 years old now, but the editor wouldn't accept that it's the actual receipt because there's no way a brand new box could be 2 years old. So now when I have to replace a box, I eat the $0.72 or $0.37 cents that the box cost me. I get tired of the rules for the receipts changing randomly depending on who's editing anyway, so I just do what I need to do.