@Susan L. wrote:
They are NOT supposed to investigate, look up the account records, balances, other accounts, etc., or try to resolve the complaint.
That could very well be true, but out of all the unauthorized account and sales tactic complaints I've done, it's been about 35/65 between the banker just logging the complaint vs. trying to play Inspector Clouseau. It rarely happens with the other two scenarios because I'm not accusing a Wells Fargo employee of any nefarious behavior; I'm only complaining about ATMs and appointment scheduling, and there's not much fact-gathering to be had there.
I did an in-branch unauthorized account last year (before the verbiage change) where I told the banker the account had been opened "by somebody" without my permission - not even hinting that it was an employee who did it. She took great umbrage at that and went so far as to print out the account opening details, which included a copy of my signature captured on the pin pad from that day, and compared it to the signature on my driver's license (which she had in front of her.) I no longer do any complaint shops at that branch just to avoid having to interact with her.
So yeah, theoretically, they aren't *supposed* to investigate, but the vast majority of them do to some extent. I think the ones who don't either don't want to deal with it or realize it's a mystery shop from the very beginning and, therefore, a waste of their time.
If your path dictates you walk through hell, do it as though you own the place. -unknown