The landscape is changing. Costs of everything have increased, but our rates have not. In fact, as I have reviewed the various MSC offerings across many apps and portals, they’ve decreased.
This is simply not sustainable.
I’m sharing my reply to a personal plea from a scheduler to do an assignment none of us can afford to do, and am interested in your thoughts about how we can talk sense to corporations that can’t look beyond “profit” to see that the current strategy is not sustainable for those of us they depend on to…do the leg work required to make their profit, or themselves in the long run:
“Thank you for keeping me in mind xxxx,
I’d love to help you, but even with the $5 bonus, after the cost of fuel and overhead, I’m not making anything, plus waiting 30-60 days to be paid for my $10 job fee and “up to $15 reimbursement” for a small item I don’t need, and no, “reimbursement” is not part of my “pay” as stated in the title of your appeal. Reimbursement is the equivalent of an interest-free loan I’m making to the payor, to complete the job as requested.
The costs of doing this assignment exceed the return, just for fuel. In summary, this assignment, even with the “bonus” is asking me to ‘pay to work.’ Would you classify that as a wise business decision?
I know you’re likely not the one making the choices about assignment rates. I feel for how hard it must be to promote this assignment, but everything has become more expensive. The higher costs of doing business are already passed on to the public (all of us) by the clients, but the job rates remain the same or have been reduced for those of us needed to gather the data.
If the client can still afford to do these studies, they can afford to pay us enough to make these assignments a gainful endeavor.
I’m just one voice, and “the messenger” often becomes a target, but it can also be the voice of reason that shifts things into something more positive for everyone.”
I need and deserve to make back my costs of doing business, plus an hourly fee in alignment with minimum wage for my time plus required skills.
Don’t you?
This is simply not sustainable.
I’m sharing my reply to a personal plea from a scheduler to do an assignment none of us can afford to do, and am interested in your thoughts about how we can talk sense to corporations that can’t look beyond “profit” to see that the current strategy is not sustainable for those of us they depend on to…do the leg work required to make their profit, or themselves in the long run:
“Thank you for keeping me in mind xxxx,
I’d love to help you, but even with the $5 bonus, after the cost of fuel and overhead, I’m not making anything, plus waiting 30-60 days to be paid for my $10 job fee and “up to $15 reimbursement” for a small item I don’t need, and no, “reimbursement” is not part of my “pay” as stated in the title of your appeal. Reimbursement is the equivalent of an interest-free loan I’m making to the payor, to complete the job as requested.
The costs of doing this assignment exceed the return, just for fuel. In summary, this assignment, even with the “bonus” is asking me to ‘pay to work.’ Would you classify that as a wise business decision?
I know you’re likely not the one making the choices about assignment rates. I feel for how hard it must be to promote this assignment, but everything has become more expensive. The higher costs of doing business are already passed on to the public (all of us) by the clients, but the job rates remain the same or have been reduced for those of us needed to gather the data.
If the client can still afford to do these studies, they can afford to pay us enough to make these assignments a gainful endeavor.
I’m just one voice, and “the messenger” often becomes a target, but it can also be the voice of reason that shifts things into something more positive for everyone.”
I need and deserve to make back my costs of doing business, plus an hourly fee in alignment with minimum wage for my time plus required skills.
Don’t you?