Philface, I haven't investigated Craigslist. The other day, I was looking around in my mystery shopping websites, and found one that had focus groups. I can't remember which one it was since I didn't sign up. It said that there is a rumor out there that focus groups pay well but that, most of the time, they consider your feeling of doing something good as most of your pay.
An interesting assignment I've had twice was to pretend to be a job seeker for a company that employs route salesmen. I got it from a temporary agency. The company was training its HR department. The assignment paid $10 an hour (from the temporary agency).
One person who was there when I was there was asked to apply for real. They told him they were very impressed with him. The first time I was there, they asked if I really wanted the job. I told them no. I thought perhaps it was not a real invitation but a courtesy one. I got the impression that the upper management was male-heavy (from their pictures on the wall since there were no females at all), and that the route salesmen don't stay long if they aren't producing to a certain level.
How they treated the fake job applicants was also significant to me. We were told to be there at a certain time, 8AM, and only one of those days were we told what the delay was when they didn't call us until about 9:00. During the course of the day, we engaged in several interviews, and we had to stay in the waiting room between times. After an interviewer took me in, he offered me coffee, which I declined, but no one else in the whole company on either day told us we could even take a break to hit the machines. We also had to stay well beyond lunchtime.
What surprised me was that the company purchased its testing materials from another company, and never asked the traditional employment questions. For me, the questions were very frustrating, and in the final analysis, I told them that both times. They said that those questions enabled them to see the person's personality. One of the hypothetical questions involved ethics. I thought that the woman who explained it to us had a personal stake in the test, that perhaps she is the one who selected and purchased it, because she became agitated when I said that. I also thought they should develop their own fine-tuned questions.
One of the tests was to show an imaginary map and ask how you change your route when you got additional assignments the night before. Well, my fake resume prepared by the temporary agency did not cover merchandising and it certainly didn't cover mystery shopping. I could have said I do that all the time!
The fine print says there are no perfect answers. The man who interviewed me last had already made a mistake by not giving me one of the tests and trying to cover up for it when an evaluator pointed it out to him, so he was nervous. He had a "cheat sheet". I said I'd convert an assignment to a phone call, cut the luncheon meeting short, and make it to a promised social obligation. The interviewer was very upset with that answer.
He questioned the social obligation. I said I don't renege on social obligations. He was beside himself by then. I pointed out that the social obligation was to a child because the hypothetical mother is a friend I seldom get to see because this is a different town than I was supposed to live in, and that I should show up early enough to be there at the social event about two hours. At that time, one of the observers started using profanity and said that her grandchildren would not run out of fun in two hours (which was part of the detail I'd given). I have lots of personal incidental information, but I didn't pursue that.
I wasn't doing this for real, so there were no repercussions. I thought I'd point out to him that the fine print said he doesn't need a cheat sheet, but I didn't. Perhaps he would have had a better appreciation of me if I had, LOL. What a place! I wouldn't work for them if they begged me. It's probably only about 25 miles from home.
One thing that really disgusted me about that assignment was that, only after the second interview did I discover that my real-life "example" answers to their hypothetical questions had to be from the last ten years of work history. It was almost like that was an invisible way to discriminate against older people. I had used anything from my past I could think of for those weird questions. Some of the questions were out there. I had to think hard to come up with some answers.
I felt like they were playing games with applicants. How could they hire with anything but a subjective feeling? I have a problem anyway with places that hire others who "fit in" with their corporate climate. Just exactly who are they eliminating?
Anyway, the temporary agencies were one of my brainstorm money-making ideas. I used to work for some on a regular basis years ago when I lived in the city. Now I live too far out to make that feasible. It's supposed to fill in gaps when I don't have work. One of the agencies, which specializes in home health, called me several times, but decided on their own that the assignments were too far away, especially since they were only paying minimum wage.