I dislike the arrogance of the company. Why in the heck is it to my advantage to purchase what a few years ago would have been a 'supercomputer' just to run the blankety blank OPERATING SYSTEM? It feels like having to serve gourmet meals to the help. And why the heck does it need to be so complicated to configure that it is strongly advised to have a 'trained professional' do software additions and deletions because it is so fragile and unforgiving? And why the heck does it require that I purchase all new equipment and software because the won't/don't support the old stuff unless the manufactures are willing to pay for 'certification' of the drivers? And yes, it is the business practices and monopolistic characteristics of Microsoft that make it such a devil.
So in answer to your question, I REALLY dislike MS!
The new Google OS is based on linux, so it may still be unfriendly to users. But then again the early Windows products were based on DOS which to many end users was unfriendly because it needed so much personal tinkering to get it to run on your specific machine. Obviously Google understands that the majority of us are end users and don't want to have to debug in binary or manually update the kernel etc. But I trust them to provide a good product since at this point the most creative end user technology minds in the country seem to be on their payroll.