sojo917 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It is my gripe. but the replies of 2006 have had 4
> years to do better. Edited the list to reflect
> 2010 and put he post of 2006 to archives. Most
> forums try to stay current even in their post
> replies.
>
> If Joe Blow says his conpany is a deal breaker in
> 2006, then unless that company has died or improve
> in 2010, I shouldn't have to read about it.
>
> All I am saying is archives the replies that are
> more than 18 months old and update the list of
> companies as a favor to us.
There's a limit to favors. If the forum moderator was charging us for the information and convenience he provides us, and this was profitable for him, he would probably spend time updating frequently. As it is, he provides this medium for us to communicate and use pretty much as we please. Any of us is free to post a new list or update the old one if we choose. Because it would be a pretty time-consuming, unpaid job, most of us choose not to do that. I communicate in the forum, but as far as compiling a list, I prefer to get paid for my work. It doesn't particularly bother me that it is outdated. Maybe someone who is bothered by it being outdated will volunteer their unpaid time to post a new list or update the old one.