ShopperG Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> @ carolyn, this matter of "right" and "wrong" in
> such a *not right* industry is tricky. I'm not
> suggesting that dishonesty is a right way to right
> a wrong, rather I am questioning what value our
> time has when considering this chase over
> non-payment! We are not salaried, and our I.C.
> fees do not cover chasing down errant companies.
> While I advocate nothing in particular here, I do
> think shoppers need to be compensated for this
> non-payment problem.
>
> As for whether to stay with SSS after they rectify
> their "errors", that seems beyond generosity, more
> like enabling. It is one thing to make an
> occasional accounting error, but this is a
> chronic, repetitive issue, and the fact that they
> do not respond to many shoppers emails does not
> indicate good will to resolve, quite the opposite.
> SSS should be shut down, and until somebody steps
> up to take more definitive action to shop them,
> the least act would be one of conscience, to sever
> ties with them.
>
> IMHO
I was thinking along the same lines. My electric and phone company charge $5.00 if you are ONE DAY late. Too late now, but I think Carolyn should have charged late charges for the 3 months she wasn,t paid, plus a amount for time and labor sending daily emails to get paid, plus interest on her money they were using.
Whatever is left over should be sent to them. And there's nothing dishonest about that as far as I'm concerned.