The scheduler seems to have thought the OP wanted
> the March assignment, since the deadline for
> February's bonused assignment had passed.
NOPE BECAUSE I DONT EVEN THINK MARCH WAS LISTED.
elcarev68 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In sorting out the details...
> The OP really should not have signed up for a shop
> with an expired deadline. But I can see wanting to
> try, because you never know.
> The MSC should make sure shops automatically drop
> off the board as soon as they expire.
> The scheduler seems to have thought the OP wanted
> the March assignment, since the deadline for
> February's bonused assignment had passed. The OP
> thought that the scheduler was offering to still
> schedule the bonused February shop. Same client,
> same location, but different months, ergo two
> different assignments, even though each thought
> they were both talking about the same assignment.
> Here's my remaining confusion...
> 1) Sara wrote, "The main issue is because you
> accepted the shop after the deadline had
> passed..."
> The OP said that the OP requested the shop after
> the deadline. Did both occur after the deadline,
> request and accept? Really gotta fix that, MSC.
> It's one thing for a shop to still show up after
> the deadline, but why would a request be approved
> after the deadline?
> 2) Sara wrote, "When you accepted the shop, it
> looked like you had already completed it." Why?
> That needs to be fixed, too.
> 3) Sara wrote, "Not to mention you sent multiple
> emails from multiple different email threads." I
> don't think that's an effective way to get heard,
> but the OP was probably feeling desperate to get
> an answer and just kept trying every email avenue
> available to see if one could get through. And,
> yep, calling on the phone would have been, and
> still is, the answer.
> But Sara, how did you know this part? The OP
> hasn't mentioned pursuing multiple email threads.