@RCElaine:
Firstly, thank you for the response! It was my expectation that there would be more positive comments with regard to my remarks. I did not wish it to denigrate but rather to generate objective opinions.
As you note, Reality Check clearly stipulates the payment terms. You have explained why in great detail as to the reasons for the lengthy period. I understand this.
However, I take issue of the length of the period. Whilst other MS companies have a swift turn-around with regard to payment (2 weeks to 30 days), yours, IMO, is overly lengthy and to me, unacceptable. Therefore, as I have stated, I shall no longer accept the payment terms.
That is my choice and my right, is it not? I simply encourage others to do the same in order to elicit change. Tilting at windmills? Perhaps.
With regard to payment amounts. Your comment about highest payment per shop average in the industry is not completely true. True, there are other shops that have similar payment amounts. However, the reports are not as detailed and time-consuming.
Quite frankly, with the amount of detail and exactness in grammar and succinctness, requiring exact note-taking of the shop itself and then further, the detailed report to follow requiring a lengthy period of time, your payment amounts are not at all in accord.
They are, at the least, minimum wage (or less) when considering the accompanying costs of simply doing business that every mystery shopper incurs. Of course, these costs are spread across the total mystery shopping business model. However, one does wish to make a profit, not a loss. With my model, I find your shops are leaving me at a repayment below minimum wage.
With regard to the payments not received as scheduled, I never stated that payments were later than the scheduled dates, simply that they were excessively lengthy (yet in accordance with the terms).
As I have said before, the terms have become unacceptable (to me).
Lastly, in my past working experience, I was employed at the corporate level dealing with others (customers as well as company employees at levels above and below my station within the company). Whenever I spoke or wrote E-mails or letters to others, I included my complete name and position within the company.
Whilst mystery shoppers should not be able to be identified, a corporate spokesperson should.
You have not. Hence, for me, that casts doubt upon your representation of Reality Check.
Sincerely, Tatjana.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 12/13/2014 01:13PM by Tatjana.