Bigbrownpoopyturd WOW, how do you find time to do that many shops and reports, plus proofread, then edit other Shoppers' reports....things that make one say ...hmmmmmm!?! Something is not meeting the smell test.
I don't know what it is like on your end, but it seems like the other posters who are upset specifically with IntelliShop, are those who are seasoned Shoppers who consistently get 9 out of 10 and even 10's with other MSCs and have so for years. So I am not sure if the ones who have complained are the ...I QUOTE YOUR STATEMENT..."..a lot of shoppers out there don't. They submit crap that reads like they dictated on their phone with talk-to-text and never proofread it. They submit narratives riddled with biased statements. They mark negative responses and don't explain why..."
It is probably unlikely that those who are slackers even care to post very often on this forum. We see a couple of major rants from time to time. But usually they rarely give the details, or what they do list it becomes clear that they did goof.
I mostly see some very legitimate gripes and have had a couple of my own. I have a pretty clear set of standards I ascribe to and see that there is some funny business going on over there. When one reads the cumulative history of certain MSCs it really reveals much of what is going on. Some companies have actually worked through their kinks and come out of the dregs. Others went bankcrupt or merged and left many Shoppers holding empty bags. We all can stand some improvement and time will tell all. But one practice that IntelliShop does is to whack Shoppers a point off merely because a Editor/Proofreader had to have a Shopper Contact for clarification, which is utterly absurd! Communication is a key ingredient in this industry, it is the first I have heard of this and know no other MSC penalizing this way. Then even if the Editor/Proofreader has been found to be in error, as in the answer is already in the paragraph but they neglected to read the whole 2-3 paragraphs or in the case of recorded shops, still other points come off. No discussion, no explanation...even when it is your guys' fault. It just becomes a ridiculous excuse for the Editor/Proofreader to claim foul for redundancy sake!
I would say more than A LOT of us take our assignments very seriously and IntelliShop would attract more bees with nectar than they will with vinegar! But if you are getting a lot of newbie or devil-may-care Shoppers perhaps you are offering too little compensation for shops and attracting wasps. Your firm will drive away all the good worker bees if you do not give adequate nuture and praise. They need to cull the inept Editors/Proofreaders who are too anal, those who do not read or lack comprehension of the English language or do not communicate to the bees what it is they are doing wrong. Most of the time Editor/Proofreaders claim spelling and/or grammar although several of us avail spellchecker programs and wonder what you found. But nothing is forthcoming and it has been used as an excuse not to be paid more often than not. THAT IS ANOTHER ANOMOLY THAT ROGUE MSCs PULL. It starts happening just before that firm is about to tank!
I hope that doesn't happen to your firm, but really someone from headquarters needs to look over how many excellent Shoppers have been chased away by Editor/Proofreaders mistakes. Some small towns and burbs only have 2 maybe 3 Shoppers to cover hundreds of miles. Some only have 1 Shopper...not every town is like major metropolises with dozens of Shoppers. MSCs are foolish if they do not do market research on how to cultivate and KEEP Shoppers. This work is not for people who do not have tenacity! Most of us realize our writing is not perfect. But after all the hoops we have to do, a little polish needed on the final report should not be the end all to be all on a job that typically nets us less than 20 bucks! Even if we are getting paid a reasonable, bonused or hefty travel sum...why should we be so heavily penalized...if we followed all the other guidelines but mispell a word or have a run on sentence...it is bad business practice not to pay us! The personality it takes to do this work does not mean that the majority of us are scholars with perfect spelling or grammar. Even the proofreading programs are fraught with errors and grammar programs rarely do the task. That is why there is a budget for Editors/Proofreaders, but not so they can bludgeon us!
We need a few Corporate Bean Counters to point out to the Editors/Proofreaders that basically that is their job to get the gist of it and then make it look all pretty in a nice package. Otherwise, your firm is going to pay for bonused shops, major delays and lose regular, very good Shoppers who are upset that they can no longer self-assign because your 7 or 8 dropped their 9 or 10 average in the toilet. And it seems like much of IntelliShop's "mistakes" relate to frivolous comprehension plus the automatic 1 point off for contacting a Shopper! Turnover for your labor force is one of the biggest expenses. Recruiting costs time which equals money. Most MSCs know who their most valuable players are and don't sweat the small stuff. They keep the MVP Shoppers and teach their Schedulers and Editors/Proofreaders how to communicate and WORK WITH the Shoppers. Good companies don't keep power tripping employees and instead cherish the folks who are the grunts out in the fray doing the field work.
Wow, it feels so good to rant. You can correct my spelling and grammar all you want. No one is perfect! But I will be damned if I continue working for a firm that uses grammar and/or spelling to avoid paying me!
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 06/21/2015 05:20PM by curiousone.
I don't know what it is like on your end, but it seems like the other posters who are upset specifically with IntelliShop, are those who are seasoned Shoppers who consistently get 9 out of 10 and even 10's with other MSCs and have so for years. So I am not sure if the ones who have complained are the ...I QUOTE YOUR STATEMENT..."..a lot of shoppers out there don't. They submit crap that reads like they dictated on their phone with talk-to-text and never proofread it. They submit narratives riddled with biased statements. They mark negative responses and don't explain why..."
It is probably unlikely that those who are slackers even care to post very often on this forum. We see a couple of major rants from time to time. But usually they rarely give the details, or what they do list it becomes clear that they did goof.
I mostly see some very legitimate gripes and have had a couple of my own. I have a pretty clear set of standards I ascribe to and see that there is some funny business going on over there. When one reads the cumulative history of certain MSCs it really reveals much of what is going on. Some companies have actually worked through their kinks and come out of the dregs. Others went bankcrupt or merged and left many Shoppers holding empty bags. We all can stand some improvement and time will tell all. But one practice that IntelliShop does is to whack Shoppers a point off merely because a Editor/Proofreader had to have a Shopper Contact for clarification, which is utterly absurd! Communication is a key ingredient in this industry, it is the first I have heard of this and know no other MSC penalizing this way. Then even if the Editor/Proofreader has been found to be in error, as in the answer is already in the paragraph but they neglected to read the whole 2-3 paragraphs or in the case of recorded shops, still other points come off. No discussion, no explanation...even when it is your guys' fault. It just becomes a ridiculous excuse for the Editor/Proofreader to claim foul for redundancy sake!
I would say more than A LOT of us take our assignments very seriously and IntelliShop would attract more bees with nectar than they will with vinegar! But if you are getting a lot of newbie or devil-may-care Shoppers perhaps you are offering too little compensation for shops and attracting wasps. Your firm will drive away all the good worker bees if you do not give adequate nuture and praise. They need to cull the inept Editors/Proofreaders who are too anal, those who do not read or lack comprehension of the English language or do not communicate to the bees what it is they are doing wrong. Most of the time Editor/Proofreaders claim spelling and/or grammar although several of us avail spellchecker programs and wonder what you found. But nothing is forthcoming and it has been used as an excuse not to be paid more often than not. THAT IS ANOTHER ANOMOLY THAT ROGUE MSCs PULL. It starts happening just before that firm is about to tank!
I hope that doesn't happen to your firm, but really someone from headquarters needs to look over how many excellent Shoppers have been chased away by Editor/Proofreaders mistakes. Some small towns and burbs only have 2 maybe 3 Shoppers to cover hundreds of miles. Some only have 1 Shopper...not every town is like major metropolises with dozens of Shoppers. MSCs are foolish if they do not do market research on how to cultivate and KEEP Shoppers. This work is not for people who do not have tenacity! Most of us realize our writing is not perfect. But after all the hoops we have to do, a little polish needed on the final report should not be the end all to be all on a job that typically nets us less than 20 bucks! Even if we are getting paid a reasonable, bonused or hefty travel sum...why should we be so heavily penalized...if we followed all the other guidelines but mispell a word or have a run on sentence...it is bad business practice not to pay us! The personality it takes to do this work does not mean that the majority of us are scholars with perfect spelling or grammar. Even the proofreading programs are fraught with errors and grammar programs rarely do the task. That is why there is a budget for Editors/Proofreaders, but not so they can bludgeon us!
We need a few Corporate Bean Counters to point out to the Editors/Proofreaders that basically that is their job to get the gist of it and then make it look all pretty in a nice package. Otherwise, your firm is going to pay for bonused shops, major delays and lose regular, very good Shoppers who are upset that they can no longer self-assign because your 7 or 8 dropped their 9 or 10 average in the toilet. And it seems like much of IntelliShop's "mistakes" relate to frivolous comprehension plus the automatic 1 point off for contacting a Shopper! Turnover for your labor force is one of the biggest expenses. Recruiting costs time which equals money. Most MSCs know who their most valuable players are and don't sweat the small stuff. They keep the MVP Shoppers and teach their Schedulers and Editors/Proofreaders how to communicate and WORK WITH the Shoppers. Good companies don't keep power tripping employees and instead cherish the folks who are the grunts out in the fray doing the field work.
Wow, it feels so good to rant. You can correct my spelling and grammar all you want. No one is perfect! But I will be damned if I continue working for a firm that uses grammar and/or spelling to avoid paying me!
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 06/21/2015 05:20PM by curiousone.