@salisburync wrote:
Ipsos has an editing problem. They are late, and they are late much more often than in the past. They are late on Sassie, and on Presto. Their sole saving grace, in the past, was that although they paid less, they paid quickly. Now, the bonuses are lower, and pay is often deferred a week or two, especially for certain clients (e.g.-Chinese fast food client). Many here on this site have defended IPSOS in the past because they paid more quickly than most MSC's...most of the time. My opinion is that they pay less, but more quickly, SOME of the time. And, their editors are getting worse.. making up rules/guidelines/instructions on the fly, in defense of questionable "rejections". It's not a good trend.
@Mousegal wrote:
@salisburync wrote:
Ipsos has an editing problem. They are late, and they are late much more often than in the past. They are late on Sassie, and on Presto. Their sole saving grace, in the past, was that although they paid less, they paid quickly. Now, the bonuses are lower, and pay is often deferred a week or two, especially for certain clients (e.g.-Chinese fast food client). Many here on this site have defended IPSOS in the past because they paid more quickly than most MSC's...most of the time. My opinion is that they pay less, but more quickly, SOME of the time. And, their editors are getting worse.. making up rules/guidelines/instructions on the fly, in defense of questionable "rejections". It's not a good trend.
Interesting, since I just had 4 gas stations rejected in a row for a reason I’ve never seen before. I appealed and got a “non-answer” answer. I have done these stations for 7 years, with two MSC’s…never had this happen. And this was two weeks after they were submitted.
@salisburync wrote:
Ipsos has an editing problem. They are late, and they are late much more often than in the past. They are late on Sassie, and on Presto.