@energyboost wrote:
Have you ever thought that it might be because the first editor might be making you fix it so that you learn from your mistakes, while the second editor is just making the fixes? At the end of the day, they will reach the same conclusion. It is often more work than it's worth to some editors to just make the corrections, while other editors will send shops back to make you correct them. It is your shop; you should be responsible for making the corrections.
@ArkLaMissshopping wrote:
Are you an editor or work for IPSOS?
@energyboost wrote:
Have you ever thought that it might be because the first editor might be making you fix it so that you learn from your mistakes, while the second editor is just making the fixes? At the end of the day, they will reach the same conclusion. It is often more work than it's worth to some editors to just make the corrections, while other editors will send shops back to make you correct them. It is your shop; you should be responsible for making the corrections.
@SBP wrote:
The editors…
I’ve always had a 10/10 rating. A single (new) editor seems to love me enough to downgrade me to a 4 and 7 of 10 for shops I’ve done at 10/10 multiple times.
I protested citing my consistent quality. Answer: it doesn’t effect your pay.