MDavisnowell Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Labor protection laws are for employees. I am not
> an employee.
>
> You say I am comparing apples and oranges. Maybe
> so. It makes as much sense as talking about
> what's going on in China, and how much a Chinese
> person would charge to do my work. $2 might be
> fair in China. How does that relate to this?
>
> Yes, if I wanted to be an employee the employer
> would pay 1/2 of my FICA taxes. What a stupendous
> deal. As it is, I have to pay my own FICA
> entirely (15% of income after deductions), but I
> get a tax credit on the self employment tax, and I
> get to deduct my travel expenses from my before
> tax income. The deduction plus the tax credit is
> certainly worth far more to me than the payment of
> 7 1/2 per cent of my income, or 1/2 of my FICA.
> Good luck on getting paid health insurance.
>
>
> I'm for all of us trying to improve conditions
> that affect us. I wish everyone well in that
> effort, and would be a fool not to realize as the
> sea goes up, my boat floats higher. That said,
> when a shop reaches the offer I want, I'm taking
> it. Isn't that what you're talking about? I'm
> holding out for the money to be right for me
> before I book anything. That is what we're
> talking about here, isn't it?
>
> I believe there is a lot we can do at the personal
> level to improve our overall income. As
> independent contractors, the responsibility for
> performance and results lies with us. Should we
> not strive to improve ourselves so that we
> minimize our output of time and energy, and
> maximize our results and income? Is that not what
> we want?
>
> Looking over my spreadsheets for the last couple
> of years and this year, I don't see any $2 days. I
> find even the suggestion that I or any other
> shopper would work for $2 day ludicrous. If you're
> working for $2 days, I suggest you look at your
> own operation. If you're not, then why are you
> talking about $2 days? Who is this person who is
> working for $2? Not me.
>
> Like Pogo said, I have met the enemy and he is me.
> The MSCs are not the enemy. If we believe the
> people we work for are the enemy, we need to work
> elsewhere.
I did not say that the MSC were the enemy nor that you or I literally worked for $2 a day. Why twist my words? As far as your enemy statement goes you are making the people in this thread that are just seeking a discussion about not lowering the value of our work your enemy for no logical reason. I'm sure I work just as hard an efficient as you do. You are no better or worse than I am. This thread is for people that want to keep compensation for our work above a low value. We are not your enemy. If you disagree with us having this discussion that is your prerogative but it doesn't take away our right to discuss the matter.