@SteveSoCal
Very well said !!
Just one note about "before blasting a company for things that
dozens of other companies also do"
Just because a dozen companies are doing the same, it does not mean whatever the action is could be justified! No mumber of wrongs ever did one right. We have to start addressing those wrongs from somewhere if we seriously desire things to change for our better.
Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I have no issue with any post about about an MSC
> that does not perform up to spec, but I think it's
> well understood that there are certain
> 'politenesses' that members expect from newbies on
> ALL public forums...not just this one.
>
> Shopper1964; Welcome to the forum, but take a
> moment to introduce yourself, look over the
> existing feedback and perhaps establish some
> rapport before blasting a company for things that
> dozens of other companies also do.
>
> Alternate reporting platforms, buggy websites and
> sole-owner/operators are common in the MS
> industry. If you have an issue with Prophet and
> how it functions, that can be up for discussion.
> If you have an issue with MSCs that take over 30
> days to pay, there's a thread for that as well.
> IF you feel you were unfairly deactivated, you
> will find others here to commiserate with.
>
> One thing I always take issue with is the
> entitlement concept of, "MSC A gave me a 10 on my
> sassie report, so how can MSC B have an issue with
> my reporting?" Not all MSCs are created equal,
> and not all have the same policies or grading
> scale. As I stated before, the qualifications for
> the shops are well presented on Sentry's site,
> IMHO, as is the pay schedule, so if you don't like
> the rules, you did not have to take the
> assignment.
>
> Now the OP has been edited and toned down, it may
> be a bit easier to stand by. My comment about
> hiding behind your screen name was based on the
> fact that you showed up and blasted this MSC with
> items that did not seem appropriate or entirely
> factual. I'm not asking you to divulge your
> identity, but realize that another persons
> livelihood rest on the success of this company, so
> perhaps an open discussion about the issues would
> have been more appropriate than a title that
> claimed, "Beware..."
>
> I have said before that I have to give props to
> Dave for showing up here, taking the heat and
> engaging each shopper that has a problem with him.
> What other company will do that?