walesmaven Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sorry, no sale. What if I had posted the same
> about a male owned company being unresponsive to
> shoppers just because most shoppers are female?
> Your comment was insulting, and unnecessarily so.
Wales, try and listen to what I said instead of only
hearing what you want to hear. It has NOTHING to do
with who owns the company. If it was a company
that was all male run with no female employees and
they treated their female shoppers better then male
shoppers, I would call them out for it just as fast as
I would call an all female company with no male employees
for treating one sex over the other better rather it be male or female.
The fact that you are insuiating that I would treat male owned
companies differently then others is insulting when it couldn't be farther
from the truth.
I simply made an observation based on the information that
was presented at the time. Sometimes the truth hurts, get over it.
Now based on more information, pm's and emails I have since received, it is
clear that they are not singling out only male shoppers, but also some female
shoppers are affected by their communication issues. Hopefully they can figure
out why and fix the issue because they are a good company to work for and
always pay well ahead of industry average.
= + = + = + = + = + = + = + = + = + = + = +
There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots
==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==
When you try to please everybody, you end up pleasing nobody