@rardon I wanted to chime in on this thread only because after reading your previous threads over the last couple of weeks on the same topic, I truly do not think that you see the difference between shops that offer fees and those that offer reimbursement strictly. So I'll offer you my recent experience:
I accepted a restaurant shop a month ago that offered a $40 reimbursement on a meal that would cover 2 people. I had the choice of evaluating the service within the restaurant from the hostess, to the server's presentation, etc. The bill came to about $47 and change for dinner with my spouse, and the experience of seeing very good customer service was enlightening considering that this was my first time to this type of restaurant. I was reimbursed the $40 from the MSC a month later, meaning that I really only spent $7 out of my pocket for a very good experience.
Due to that experience, I have since returned to that same restaurant 4 more times for dinner, none of which were for a mystery shopping evaluation. Fast forward a couple weeks afterward, I did a different type of restaurant in another city for both a fee + reimbursement. The fee was exceptionally higher, and the reimbursement only covered up to $25. This was for a lunch evaluation. My bill came to $23 and change, all of which the MSC reimbursed me the full cost of the meal $23 + the fee.
Based on my experiences with both of these restaurants, I can tell you that if I had the choice to do both evaluations again, I would choose both without excluding one of the other. Why? Two things, really. First, I place a high value on things that I really like. In one case, I wasn't paid a fee, yet was introduced to a very upscale restaurant that I enjoyed with my spouse. I like this place so much that I've returned a few more times after the evaluation had concluded.
The second thing is due to my choice of accepting such an assignment or not. While it is always a desirable notion to have a fee associated with a reimbursement, that is not always the case. I was fortunate with restaurant #2 that it had both elements, yet it was my choice in accepting the reimbursement of restaurant #1.
I understand that you are quite disapointed in your prior experience with this type of shopping scenario. However, just keep in mind that while there is monetary value in choosing an assignment with a fee associated with a reimbursement, there is also a more intrinsic value in those assignments that do not have fees. This can be with any type of restaurant, hotel, retail scenario that the MSC designs to fit their client's needs. This is not in no way, shape or form, a way to take advantage of shoppers.
My key words within this post are value, and choice. I truly, truly hope that you are to really see the difference given between the types of shop scenarios that are associated with fees + reimbursements, and reimbursements w/o fees. Either which way, there is both monetary and intrinsic value associated with both.