If I'm okay with the fee, I'm going to take it. I'm talking about the shoppers who take shops that are ridiculously low.
Another factor is when I am already going somewhere and there is a shop for that place. For example, if I already decided I want to go eat wings, I may be inclined to take that shop so my meal would be discounted.
One shop that I noticed stays on the board until the bitter end are certain "novelty" shops, where they pay $7 plus up to $5 reimbursement. They try and act like they're doing someone a big favor by adding a $2, $3 or $5 rush bonus. I'm sorry, the report for these shops require a bit more money for me to complete.
Curlzzzzzzzz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'm amazed that the Lowe's start at $4. I just
> started with that company and refuse to do the gas
> station audits for the $6 they offer. Plus $1 gas
> reimbursement? Looks fishy to the gas station
> associate, don't you think? I like when I see a
> bonus attached to a shop, BUT, not to support
> either side, I just play Devil's advocate and look
> at both sides.....even if this is a seasoned
> shopper, are they seasoned with THAT company to
> know how much higher the fees go? And, maybe that
> seasoned shopper usually waits for the fees to go
> up, but by the time they are up, someone else
> grabbed it, so this time, they planned their
> routes and snagged the job first just to throw
> things off but still is making the same profit
> amount because they pre-planned a good route? I
> will say, since moving, I have signed up with more
> MSC because I am in a larger area. So, some of the
> newer companies, to me, have average paying jobs
> plus reimbursement (because the area I was in
> before, these are the amounts one would see with
> the bonuses). So, even though I am seasoned and
> have performed mystery shopping for a long time, I
> will be humble and admit, I might take a job for
> what I think is a fair amount, but to someone else
> working for that company for longer might think
> "hey! why did someone take that low of a job!?!"
>
> I do prefer a good bonus, but if I'm already 'ok'
> with the amount, and I have time, I'll take it.
> Afterall, someone is going to get it. And yes, as
> much as we all want to 'help' one another here,
> the truth of the matter is it's a dog eat dog
> world and we're all competing for a bone. The
> meatier the bone, the tougher the competition. We
> all have bills and savings goals. So, yup, the
> original poster is irritated because she feels/is
> worried about how this will impact her wallet. The
> 'low-balling snagger', well, they have a wallet
> too and maybe, just maybe taking it low was more
> important to his/her wallet than waiting it out
> and having $0 because of a 'high ball snagger'.
>
> just my "looking-at-both-sides" opinion.
Arguing with fools is like playing chess with a pigeon...
...No matter how good you are, the pigeon will s@^t on the board and strut around like it won anyway.
Not scheduling for ANY company.